FirePro S9050 vs GeForce GT 755M
In this comparison between FirePro S9050 and GeForce GT 755M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro S9050 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GT 755M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GT 755M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 755M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 755M here:
Main Specs
FirePro S9050
GeForce GT 755M
Power consumption (TDP)
225 Watt
50 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1x 8-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
12 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
1x DisplayPort
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
FirePro S9050 has 350% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 755M.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
FirePro S9050 has 8 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 755M.
FirePro S9050 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GT 755M - in Laptops.
FirePro S9050 is build with GCN 1.0 architecture, and GeForce GT 755M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GeForce GT 755M is 80 MHz higher, than FirePro S9050.
FirePro S9050 and GeForce GT 755M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of FirePro S9050 is 100 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 755M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
20−22
7−8
ultra / 1080p
12−14
4−5
QHD / 1440p
6−7
0−1
4K / 2160p
5−6
−
low / 720p
35−40
18−20
medium / 1080p
24−27
9−10
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
high / 1080p
30−35
12−14
ultra / 1080p
27−30
10−12
QHD / 1440p
10−12
0−1
4K / 2160p
7−8
−
low / 720p
65−70
27−30
medium / 1080p
35−40
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Battlefield 5 is 156% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
low / 768p
230−240
140−150
medium / 768p
200−210
110−120
ultra / 1080p
110−120
55−60
QHD / 1440p
85−90
30−35
4K / 2160p
45−50
27−30
high / 768p
160−170
85−90
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 84% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
low / 768p
60−65
55−60
ultra / 1080p
50−55
21−24
medium / 1080p
55−60
45−50
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 35% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
low / 768p
120−130
85−90
medium / 768p
100−110
60−65
ultra / 1080p
80−85
35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Dota 2 is 67% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
high / 1080p
24−27
9−10
ultra / 1080p
21−24
8−9
QHD / 1440p
18−20
−
4K / 2160p
7−8
4−5
low / 720p
50−55
21−24
medium / 1080p
27−30
10−11
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Far Cry 5 is 145% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
high / 1080p
30−35
16−18
ultra / 1080p
24−27
10−12
QHD / 1440p
14−16
−
low / 720p
120−130
65−70
medium / 1080p
70−75
24−27
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Fortnite is 110% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
high / 1080p
30−35
12−14
ultra / 1080p
24−27
12−14
QHD / 1440p
12−14
2−3
4K / 2160p
12−14
−
low / 720p
65−70
27−30
medium / 1080p
35−40
14−16
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 150% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
low / 768p
100−110
55−60
medium / 768p
90−95
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
14−16
ultra / 1080p
16−18
7−8
QHD / 1440p
7−8
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 93% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
high / 1080p
12−14
5−6
ultra / 1080p
10−11
3−4
QHD / 1440p
10−11
−
4K / 2160p
2−3
0−1
low / 720p
40−45
14−16
medium / 1080p
16−18
7−8
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Metro Exodus is 185% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
low / 768p
120−130
95−100
high / 1080p
−
90−95
ultra / 1080p
−
80−85
medium / 1080p
110−120
95−100
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Minecraft is 23% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
14−16
14−16
low / 720p
70−75
35−40
medium / 1080p
18−20
18−20
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 52% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
high / 1080p
14−16
−
ultra / 1080p
10−11
8−9
QHD / 1440p
1−2
0−1
4K / 2160p
1−2
−
low / 720p
35−40
14−16
medium / 1080p
20−22
10−12
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 109% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
low / 768p
70−75
27−30
medium / 768p
45−50
18−20
high / 1080p
24−27
10−11
ultra / 1080p
14−16
7−8
4K / 2160p
8−9
6−7
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 135% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
low / 768p
90−95
85−90
medium / 768p
60−65
45−50
ultra / 1080p
40−45
21−24
high / 768p
55−60
35−40
The average gaming FPS of FirePro S9050 in World of Tanks is 31% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
Full Specs
FirePro S9050
GeForce GT 755M
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Kepler
Code name
Tahiti
N14P-
Type
Workstation
Laptop
Release date
7 August 2014
25 June 2013
Pipelines
1792
384
Core clock speed
900 MHz
980 MHz
Transistor count
4,313 million
1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
100.8
31.36
Floating-point performance
3,226 gflops
752.6 gflops
Length
254 mm
Memory bus width
384 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5500 MHz
5400 MHz
Memory bandwidth
264 GB/s
86.4 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 API
Shader Model
5.1
5.1
OpenGL
4.6
4.5
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
1.2.131
1.1.126
CUDA
+
Bus support
PCIe 3.0
PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
27 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Standard memory configuration
GDDR5
eDP 1.2 signal support
Up to 3840x2160
LVDS signal support
Up to 1920x1200
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support
Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
+
Optimus
+
Form factor
full height / full length
Blu-Ray 3D Support
+
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
+
Check Price
Check Price