FirePro V5800 vs GeForce GT 755M
When choosing between FirePro V5800 and GeForce GT 755M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FirePro V5800 and GeForce GT 755M.
FirePro V5800
GeForce GT 755M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 755M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 755M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro V5800 | GeForce GT 755M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 74 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro V5800 has 48% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 755M.
- FirePro V5800 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GT 755M uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GT 755M has 3 GB more memory, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GT 755M - in Laptops.
- FirePro V5800 is build with TeraScale 2 architecture, and GeForce GT 755M - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 755M is 290 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
- FirePro V5800 is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GT 755M - by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 755M is 1400 MHz higher, than FirePro V5800.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 25% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Battlefield 5 is 23% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro V5800 and GeForce GT 755M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 100−110 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Dota 2 is 12% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Far Cry 5 is 22% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Fortnite is 15% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 1−2 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Forza Horizon 4 is 16% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Grand Theft Auto V is 17% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Metro Exodus is 16% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 90−95 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Minecraft is 4% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 30−35 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 10−12 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 22% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 21−24 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 23% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 40−45 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in World of Tanks is 4% more, than FirePro V5800. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro V5800 | GeForce GT 755M | |
| Architecture | TeraScale 2 | Kepler |
| Code name | Juniper | N14P- |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 26 April 2010 | 25 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 800 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 690 MHz | 980 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,040 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 27.60 | 31.36 |
| Floating-point performance | 1,104.0 gflops | 752.6 gflops |
| Length | 229 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4000 MHz | 5400 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 64 GB/s | 86.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.2 (11_0) | 12 API |
| Shader Model | 5.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
| Check Price |