GeForce GT 755M vs GeForce GTX 295
When comparing GeForce GT 755M and GeForce GTX 295, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GT 755M and GeForce GTX 295 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 295
GeForce GT 755M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 755M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 755M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 755M | GeForce GTX 295 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 289 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1792 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 295 has 478% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 755M.
- GeForce GT 755M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 295 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 295 has 1788 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 755M.
- GeForce GT 755M is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 295 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 755M is build with Kepler architecture, and GeForce GTX 295 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 295 is 262 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 755M.
- GeForce GT 755M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 295 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 755M is 4401 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 295.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Battlefield 5 is 63% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 17% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 295 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Dota 2 is 19% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Far Cry 5 is 57% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Fortnite is 36% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Grand Theft Auto V is 30% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Minecraft is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 37% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 60% more, than GeForce GTX 295. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in World of Tanks is 23% more, than GeForce GTX 295. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 755M | GeForce GTX 295 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Tesla 2.0 |
Code name | N14P- | GT200B |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 25 June 2013 | 8 January 2009 |
Pipelines | 384 | 240 |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 1242 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,400 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.36 | 92.2 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops | 2x 596.2 gflops |
Length | 10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 896 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz | 999 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s | 223.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 2.1 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | + |
CUDA cores | 480 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | + |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
CUDA cores per GPU | 240 | |
Standard memory config per GPU | 896 MB | |
Memory interface width per GPU | 448 Bit | |
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR) | 128bit | |
Check Price |