GeForce GT 755M vs GeForce GTX 460 SE
When comparing GeForce GT 755M and GeForce GTX 460 SE, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GT 755M and GeForce GTX 460 SE is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTX 460 SE
GeForce GT 755M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 755M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 755M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 755M | GeForce GTX 460 SE | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 150 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 6-pin & 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 460 SE has 200% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 755M.
- GeForce GT 755M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTX 460 SE uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GT 755M has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
- GeForce GT 755M is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 755M is build with Kepler architecture, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 460 SE is 320 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 755M.
- GeForce GT 755M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 460 SE - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 755M is 3700 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 460 SE.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 20% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Battlefield 5 is 18% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GT 755M and GeForce GTX 460 SE have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 160−170 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 130−140 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 40−45 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 85−90 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 16% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Dota 2 is 12% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Far Cry 5 is 9% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Fortnite is 13% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Forza Horizon 4 is 28% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 55−60 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Grand Theft Auto V is 15% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Metro Exodus is 28% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 100−110 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 90−95 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Minecraft is 6% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 9% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 18% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 21−24 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 21% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 24−27 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 460 SE in World of Tanks is 10% more, than GeForce GT 755M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 755M | GeForce GTX 460 SE | |
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | N14P- | GF104 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 25 June 2013 | 15 November 2010 |
Pipelines | 384 | 288 |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 1300 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,950 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.36 | 31.2 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops | 748.8 gflops |
Length | 8.25" (210 mm) (21 cm) | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz | 1700 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s | 108.8 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.1 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | + |
CUDA cores | 288 | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | 16x PCI-E 2.0 |
Height | 4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm) | |
SLI options | + | |
Multi monitor support | + | |
HDMI | + | + |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | Internal | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | 48 Mh/s |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Number of display connectors | 2 | |
Check Price |