GeForce GT 755M vs GeForce MX150
In this comparison between GeForce GT 755M and GeForce MX150 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 755M will be the best choice, for others GeForce MX150 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GT 755M and GeForce MX150 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GT 755M and GeForce MX150 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 755M or GeForce MX150 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 755M
GeForce MX150
Power consumption (TDP)
50 Watt
10 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GT 755M has 400% more power consumption, than GeForce MX150.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
GeForce GT 755M and GeForce MX150 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce GT 755M is build with Kepler architecture, and GeForce MX150 - with Pascal.
Core clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 488 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 755M.
GeForce GT 755M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce MX150 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce MX150 is 608 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 755M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
7−8
12−14
ultra / 1080p
4−5
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
18−20
24−27
medium / 1080p
9−10
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 50% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
high / 1080p
12−14
18−20
ultra / 1080p
10−12
16−18
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
27−30
40−45
medium / 1080p
14−16
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Battlefield 5 is 56% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GT 755M and GeForce MX150 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
140−150
180−190
medium / 768p
110−120
150−160
ultra / 1080p
55−60
80−85
QHD / 1440p
30−35
45−50
4K / 2160p
27−30
30−33
high / 768p
85−90
120−130
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 35% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
21−24
30−35
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 7% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
low / 768p
85−90
100−110
medium / 768p
60−65
80−85
ultra / 1080p
35−40
50−55
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Dota 2 is 29% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
high / 1080p
9−10
14−16
ultra / 1080p
8−9
12−14
4K / 2160p
4−5
5−6
low / 720p
21−24
30−35
medium / 1080p
10−11
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Far Cry 5 is 45% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−12
14−16
low / 720p
65−70
85−90
medium / 1080p
24−27
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Fortnite is 36% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
high / 1080p
12−14
20−22
ultra / 1080p
12−14
16−18
QHD / 1440p
2−3
6−7
low / 720p
27−30
40−45
medium / 1080p
14−16
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
low / 768p
55−60
70−75
medium / 768p
50−55
65−70
high / 1080p
14−16
21−24
ultra / 1080p
7−8
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Grand Theft Auto V is 30% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
high / 1080p
5−6
7−8
ultra / 1080p
3−4
6−7
4K / 2160p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
14−16
21−24
medium / 1080p
7−8
10−11
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Metro Exodus is 57% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
low / 768p
95−100
100−110
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
95−100
medium / 1080p
95−100
100−110
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Minecraft is 10% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
high / 1080p
16−18
20−22
ultra / 1080p
14−16
16−18
low / 720p
35−40
45−50
medium / 1080p
18−20
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 22% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
21−24
medium / 1080p
10−12
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 36% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
low / 768p
27−30
40−45
medium / 768p
18−20
27−30
high / 1080p
10−11
14−16
ultra / 1080p
7−8
9−10
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 42% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
low / 768p
85−90
95−100
medium / 768p
45−50
55−60
ultra / 1080p
21−24
27−30
high / 768p
35−40
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX150 in World of Tanks is 18% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
Full Specs
GeForce GT 755M
GeForce MX150
Architecture
Kepler
Pascal
Code name
N14P-
N17S-G1
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
25 June 2013
16 May 2017
Pipelines
384
384
Core clock speed
980 MHz
1468 MHz
Boost Clock
1532 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
31.36
24.91
Floating-point performance
752.6 gflops
1,127 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
5400 MHz
6008 MHz
Memory bandwidth
86.4 GB/s
40.1 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 API
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2.131
CUDA
+
6.1
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
27 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
large
Standard memory configuration
GDDR5
eDP 1.2 signal support
Up to 3840x2160
LVDS signal support
Up to 1920x1200
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support
Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
+
Optimus
+
Blu-Ray 3D Support
+
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
+
Check Price
Check Price