GeForce GT 755M vs GeForce MX250
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GT 755M and GeForce MX250, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GT 755M stacks up against GeForce MX250, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GT 755M and GeForce MX250 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GT 755M and GeForce MX250 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 755M or GeForce MX250 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 755M
GeForce MX250
Power consumption (TDP)
50 Watt
10 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x4
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GT 755M has 400% more power consumption, than GeForce MX250.
GeForce GT 755M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce MX250 uses PCIe 3.0 x4 interface.
GeForce GT 755M and GeForce MX250 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce GT 755M is build with Kepler architecture, and GeForce MX250 - with Pascal.
Core clock speed of GeForce MX250 is 538 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 755M.
GeForce GT 755M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce MX250 - by 14 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce MX250 is 1600 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 755M.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
7−8
12−14
ultra / 1080p
4−5
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
18−20
27−30
medium / 1080p
9−10
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 60% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
high / 1080p
12−14
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−12
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
27−30
45−50
medium / 1080p
14−16
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Battlefield 5 is 68% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GT 755M and GeForce MX250 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
140−150
190−200
medium / 768p
110−120
160−170
ultra / 1080p
55−60
85−90
QHD / 1440p
30−35
50−55
4K / 2160p
27−30
30−33
high / 768p
85−90
120−130
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 41% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
21−24
35−40
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
low / 768p
85−90
100−110
medium / 768p
60−65
85−90
ultra / 1080p
35−40
55−60
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Dota 2 is 33% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
high / 1080p
9−10
14−16
ultra / 1080p
8−9
14−16
4K / 2160p
4−5
5−6
low / 720p
21−24
35−40
medium / 1080p
10−11
16−18
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Far Cry 5 is 63% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
10−12
16−18
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
65−70
90−95
medium / 1080p
24−27
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Fortnite is 46% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
high / 1080p
12−14
21−24
ultra / 1080p
12−14
18−20
QHD / 1440p
2−3
7−8
low / 720p
27−30
45−50
medium / 1080p
14−16
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Forza Horizon 4 is 71% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
low / 768p
55−60
75−80
medium / 768p
50−55
70−75
high / 1080p
14−16
24−27
ultra / 1080p
7−8
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Grand Theft Auto V is 39% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
high / 1080p
5−6
8−9
ultra / 1080p
3−4
6−7
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
14−16
24−27
medium / 1080p
7−8
10−12
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Metro Exodus is 71% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
low / 768p
95−100
100−110
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
100−105
medium / 1080p
95−100
100−110
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Minecraft is 13% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
16−18
low / 720p
35−40
50−55
medium / 1080p
18−20
21−24
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
24−27
medium / 1080p
10−12
14−16
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 45% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
low / 768p
27−30
45−50
medium / 768p
18−20
30−33
high / 1080p
10−11
16−18
ultra / 1080p
7−8
10−11
4K / 2160p
6−7
7−8
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 57% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
low / 768p
85−90
95−100
medium / 768p
45−50
55−60
ultra / 1080p
21−24
30−35
high / 768p
35−40
50−55
The average gaming FPS of GeForce MX250 in World of Tanks is 25% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
Full Specs
GeForce GT 755M
GeForce MX250
Architecture
Kepler
Pascal
Code name
N14P-
N17S-G2
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
25 June 2013
20 February 2019
Pipelines
384
384
Core clock speed
980 MHz
1518 MHz
Boost Clock
1582 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
1,800 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
31.36
24.91
Floating-point performance
752.6 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
64 Bit
Memory clock speed
5400 MHz
7000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
86.4 GB/s
48.06 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
12 API
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
5.1
6.4
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
1.1.126
1.2
CUDA
+
6.1
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
HDMI
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
27 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
large
Standard memory configuration
GDDR5
eDP 1.2 signal support
Up to 3840x2160
LVDS signal support
Up to 1920x1200
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support
Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
+
Optimus
+
Blu-Ray 3D Support
+
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
+
Check Price
Check Price
