GeForce GT 755M vs P104 100
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GT 755M and P104 100. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GT 755M and P104 100. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
P104 100
GeForce GT 755M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 755M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 755M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GT 755M | P104 100 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5X |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GT 755M and P104 100 have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GeForce GT 755M is used in Laptops, and P104 100 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 755M is build with Kepler architecture, and P104 100 - with Pascal.
- Core clock speed of P104 100 is 627 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 755M.
- GeForce GT 755M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and P104 100 - by 16 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of P104 100 is 4608 MHz higher, than GeForce GT 755M.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 310% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Battlefield 5 is 325% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 85−90 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 129% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Dota 2 is 85% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Far Cry 5 is 327% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Fortnite is 240% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Forza Horizon 4 is 350% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Metro Exodus is 414% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Minecraft is 34% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 100% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 263% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 342% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of P104 100 in World of Tanks is 39% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GT 755M | P104 100 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Pascal |
| Code name | N14P- | GP104 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 25 June 2013 | 12 December 2017 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 1920 |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 1607 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 7,200 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.36 | 208.0 |
| Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops | 8,873 gflops |
| Length | 267 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz | 10008 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s | 320.3 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (12_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 6.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | 6.1 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
| Check Price |