GeForce GT 755M vs Quadro K2200M
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GT 755M and Quadro K2200M, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GT 755M stacks up against Quadro K2200M, check out specs charts below.
Quadro K2200M
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GT 755M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 755M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 755M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 755M | Quadro K2200M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 65 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-A (3.0) |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Quadro K2200M has 30% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 755M.
- GeForce GT 755M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Quadro K2200M uses MXM-A (3.0) interface.
- GeForce GT 755M has 2 GB more memory, than Quadro K2200M.
- GeForce GT 755M is used in Laptops, and Quadro K2200M - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 755M is build with Kepler architecture, and Quadro K2200M - with Maxwell.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 755M is 313 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
- GeForce GT 755M and Quadro K2200M are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 755M is 388 MHz higher, than Quadro K2200M.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 140% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 27−30 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Battlefield 5 is 156% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 230−240 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 200−210 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 85−90 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 45−50 |
high / 768p | 85−90 | 160−170 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 84% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 35% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 75−80 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Dota 2 is 64% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Far Cry 5 is 136% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 120−130 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Fortnite is 110% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Forza Horizon 4 is 150% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Grand Theft Auto V is 93% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 10−11 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Metro Exodus is 185% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 120−130 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Minecraft is 23% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 52% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 20−22 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 109% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 135% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K2200M in World of Tanks is 31% more, than GeForce GT 755M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 755M | Quadro K2200M | |
Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
Code name | N14P- | GM107 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 25 June 2013 | 19 July 2014 |
Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 667 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,870 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.36 | 26.68 |
Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops | 853.8 gflops |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz | 5012 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s | 80 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 5.0 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | + |
Display Port | 1.2 | |
3D Vision Pro | + | |
Mosaic | + | |
nView Display Management | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |