GeForce GT 755M vs Radeon HD 4850 X2
When comparing GeForce GT 755M and Radeon HD 4850 X2, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GT 755M and Radeon HD 4850 X2 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Radeon HD 4850 X2
GeForce GT 755M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 755M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 755M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 755M | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 250 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 512 MB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 4x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 400% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 755M.
- GeForce GT 755M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon HD 4850 X2 has 508 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 755M.
- GeForce GT 755M is used in Laptops, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 755M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - with TeraScale.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 755M is 355 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4850 X2.
- GeForce GT 755M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Radeon HD 4850 X2 - by 55 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 755M is 3410 MHz higher, than Radeon HD 4850 X2.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 66% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Battlefield 5 is 63% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 30−35 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 17% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 40−45 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 24−27 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 18−20 |
high / 768p | 85−90 | 65−70 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 24% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 80−85 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon HD 4850 X2 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 9% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Dota 2 is 19% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | − |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Far Cry 5 is 57% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 7−8 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Fortnite is 36% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 20−22 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Forza Horizon 4 is 50% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | − |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | − | 40−45 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Grand Theft Auto V is 30% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 1−2 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 4−5 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Metro Exodus is 75% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Minecraft is 6% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 27% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 37% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 16−18 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 12−14 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 6−7 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 5−6 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 60% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 16−18 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in World of Tanks is 23% more, than Radeon HD 4850 X2. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 755M | Radeon HD 4850 X2 | |
Architecture | Kepler | TeraScale |
Code name | N14P- | R700 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 25 June 2013 | 7 November 2008 |
Pipelines | 384 | 800 |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 625 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 956 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.36 | 25.00 |
Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops | 2x 1,000.0 gflops |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz | 1990 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s | 63.68 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 10.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 3.3 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |