GeForce GT 755M vs Radeon R7 260
In this comparison between GeForce GT 755M and Radeon R7 260 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 755M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 260 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GT 755M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 755M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 755M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 755M
Radeon R7 260
Power consumption (TDP)
50 Watt
115 Watt
Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
1 x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
4 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon R7 260 has 130% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 755M.
Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
GeForce GT 755M has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 260.
GeForce GT 755M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 260 - in Desktops.
GeForce GT 755M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 260 - with GCN 2.0.
GeForce GT 755M and Radeon R7 260 are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 755M is 3775 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 260.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
7−8
14−16
ultra / 1080p
4−5
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
18−20
30−35
medium / 1080p
9−10
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 80% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
high / 1080p
12−14
24−27
ultra / 1080p
10−12
20−22
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
27−30
50−55
medium / 1080p
14−16
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Battlefield 5 is 93% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
low / 768p
45−50
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GT 755M and Radeon R7 260 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
140−150
200−210
medium / 768p
110−120
170−180
ultra / 1080p
55−60
95−100
QHD / 1440p
30−35
50−55
4K / 2160p
27−30
30−33
high / 768p
85−90
140−150
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 51% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
low / 768p
55−60
55−60
ultra / 1080p
21−24
35−40
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
low / 768p
85−90
110−120
medium / 768p
60−65
90−95
ultra / 1080p
35−40
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Dota 2 is 45% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
high / 1080p
9−10
16−18
ultra / 1080p
8−9
16−18
4K / 2160p
4−5
6−7
low / 720p
21−24
35−40
medium / 1080p
10−11
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Far Cry 5 is 72% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
high / 1080p
16−18
24−27
ultra / 1080p
10−12
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
65−70
95−100
medium / 1080p
24−27
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Fortnite is 60% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
high / 1080p
12−14
24−27
ultra / 1080p
12−14
20−22
QHD / 1440p
2−3
9−10
low / 720p
27−30
50−55
medium / 1080p
14−16
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Forza Horizon 4 is 92% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
low / 768p
55−60
85−90
medium / 768p
50−55
75−80
high / 1080p
14−16
27−30
ultra / 1080p
7−8
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Grand Theft Auto V is 54% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
high / 1080p
5−6
9−10
ultra / 1080p
3−4
7−8
4K / 2160p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
14−16
27−30
medium / 1080p
7−8
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Metro Exodus is 100% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
low / 768p
95−100
110−120
high / 1080p
90−95
−
ultra / 1080p
80−85
100−110
medium / 1080p
95−100
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Minecraft is 17% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
high / 1080p
16−18
21−24
ultra / 1080p
14−16
16−18
low / 720p
35−40
55−60
medium / 1080p
18−20
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 36% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
8−9
9−10
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
27−30
medium / 1080p
10−12
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 63% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
low / 768p
27−30
50−55
medium / 768p
18−20
30−35
high / 1080p
10−11
18−20
ultra / 1080p
7−8
10−12
4K / 2160p
6−7
8−9
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 71% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
low / 768p
85−90
100−110
medium / 768p
45−50
60−65
ultra / 1080p
21−24
35−40
high / 768p
35−40
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 260 in World of Tanks is 33% more, than GeForce GT 755M.
Full Specs
GeForce GT 755M
Radeon R7 260
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 2.0
Code name
N14P-
Bonaire
Type
Laptop
Desktop
Release date
25 June 2013
17 December 2013
Pipelines
384
768
Core clock speed
980 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
Transistor count
1,270 million
2,080 million
Manufacturing process technology
28 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
31.36
48.00
Floating-point performance
752.6 gflops
1,536 gflops
Length
170 mm
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5400 MHz
1625 MHz
Memory bandwidth
86.4 GB/s
104 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
12 API
Shader Model
5.1
6.3
OpenGL
4.5
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
1.1.126
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
Bus support
PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0
PCIe 3.0
HDMI
+
+
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
27 Mh/s
240 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
Standard memory configuration
GDDR5
eDP 1.2 signal support
Up to 3840x2160
LVDS signal support
Up to 1920x1200
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support
Up to 3840x2160
HDCP content protection
+
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI
+
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming
+
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder
+
Optimus
+
Eyefinity
+
Design
reference
DisplayPort support
+
DDMA audio
+
Blu-Ray 3D Support
+
3D Vision / 3DTV Play
+
Check Price
Check Price