GeForce GT 755M vs Radeon R7 M465X
In this comparison between GeForce GT 755M and Radeon R7 M465X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GT 755M will be the best choice, for others Radeon R7 M465X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
Radeon R7 M465X
GeForce GT 755M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 755M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 755M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GT 755M | Radeon R7 M465X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GT 755M has 2 GB more memory, than Radeon R7 M465X.
- GeForce GT 755M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M465X - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 755M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R7 M465X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 755M is 80 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M465X.
- GeForce GT 755M and Radeon R7 M465X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 755M is 900 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M465X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 10−11 |
| GeForce GT 755M and Radeon R7 M465X have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| GeForce GT 755M and Radeon R7 M465X have the same average FPS in Battlefield 5. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GT 755M and Radeon R7 M465X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 150−160 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 120−130 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 6% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GeForce GT 755M and Radeon R7 M465X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 65−70 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Dota 2 is 3% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| GeForce GT 755M and Radeon R7 M465X have the same average FPS in Far Cry 5. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Fortnite is 3% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 30−33 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Forza Horizon 4 is 7% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GT 755M and Radeon R7 M465X have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Metro Exodus is 14% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | 90−95 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 85−90 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 95−100 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in Minecraft is 1% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| GeForce GT 755M and Radeon R7 M465X have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| GeForce GT 755M and Radeon R7 M465X have the same average FPS in Red Dead Redemption 2. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| GeForce GT 755M and Radeon R7 M465X have the same average FPS in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M465X in World of Tanks is 4% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GT 755M | Radeon R7 M465X | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N14P- | Tropo |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 25 June 2013 | 15 May 2016 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 512 |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 900 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 925 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.36 | 29.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops | 947.2 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz | 4500 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
| Check Price |