GeForce GT 755M vs Radeon R9 M270X
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GT 755M and Radeon R9 M270X, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GT 755M stacks up against Radeon R9 M270X, check out specs charts below.
Radeon R9 M270X
GeForce GT 755M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 755M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 755M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GT 755M | Radeon R9 M270X | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- Both video cards are using PCIe 3.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GT 755M and Radeon R9 M270X have maximum RAM of 4 GB.
- GeForce GT 755M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R9 M270X - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 755M is build with Kepler architecture, and Radeon R9 M270X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 755M is 255 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M270X.
- GeForce GT 755M and Radeon R9 M270X are manufactured by 28 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 755M is 4275 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M270X.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 11% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Battlefield 5 is 6% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GT 755M and Radeon R9 M270X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| high / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 8% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 2% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Dota 2 is 12% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 8−9 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 8−9 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Far Cry 5 is 22% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Fortnite is 11% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 10−12 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 1−2 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Forza Horizon 4 is 16% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 50−55 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Grand Theft Auto V is 13% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 4−5 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Metro Exodus is 16% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | 85−90 |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 90−95 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Minecraft is 4% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 30−35 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 10% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 22% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 24−27 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 16−18 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 9−10 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 6−7 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 14% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GT 755M in World of Tanks is 4% more, than Radeon R9 M270X. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GT 755M | Radeon R9 M270X | |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N14P- | Venus |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 25 June 2013 | 21 March 2014 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 640 |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 725 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 775 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 1,500 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.36 | 31.00 |
| Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops | 1,536 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz | 1125 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s | 72 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.4 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | |
| CUDA | + | |
| FreeSync | + | |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Eyefinity | + | |
| HD3D | + | |
| PowerTune | + | |
| DualGraphics | + | |
| ZeroCore | + | |
| Switchable graphics | + | |
| Mantle | + | |
| Compute units | 10 | |
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
| Check Price |