GeForce GT 755M vs Tesla C2050
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GT 755M and Tesla C2050. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GT 755M and Tesla C2050. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Tesla C2050
GeForce GT 755M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 755M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 755M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GT 755M | Tesla C2050 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 238 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 3 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
| Check Price |
- Tesla C2050 has 376% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 755M.
- GeForce GT 755M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2050 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GT 755M has 1 GB more memory, than Tesla C2050.
- GeForce GT 755M is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2050 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 755M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2050 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 755M is 406 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
- GeForce GT 755M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2050 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 755M is 2400 MHz higher, than Tesla C2050.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 7−8 | 18−20 |
| ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 10−11 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
| low / 720p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 120% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 24−27 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Battlefield 5 is 131% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 220−230 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 190−200 |
| ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 110−120 |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 70−75 |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 85−90 | 150−160 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 72% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 30% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
| ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Dota 2 is 56% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
| 4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 24−27 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Far Cry 5 is 118% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 110−120 |
| medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Fortnite is 90% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 10−12 |
| low / 720p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Forza Horizon 4 is 135% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| low / 768p | 55−60 | 95−100 |
| medium / 768p | 50−55 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Grand Theft Auto V is 78% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−12 |
| ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 9−10 |
| 4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Metro Exodus is 157% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 35−40 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 43% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 100% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| low / 768p | 27−30 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
| 4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 7−8 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 114% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
| low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
| high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
| The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2050 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GT 755M | Tesla C2050 | |
| Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
| Code name | N14P- | GF100 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 25 June 2013 | 25 July 2011 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 448 |
| Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 574 MHz |
| Transistor count | 1,270 million | 3,100 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 31.36 | 32.14 |
| Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
| Length | 248 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz | 3000 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s | 144.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 2.0 |
| Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | 90 Mh/s |
| Laptop size | medium sized | |
| Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
| eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
| DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
| HDCP content protection | + | |
| 7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
| TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
| H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
| Optimus | + | |
| Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
| 3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
| Check Price |