GeForce GT 755M vs Tesla C2070
When choosing between GeForce GT 755M and Tesla C2070, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GT 755M and Tesla C2070.
Tesla C2070
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GT 755M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GT 755M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GT 755M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GT 755M | Tesla C2070 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 50 Watt | 238 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 4 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI |
Check Price |
- Tesla C2070 has 376% more power consumption, than GeForce GT 755M.
- GeForce GT 755M is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and Tesla C2070 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Tesla C2070 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GT 755M.
- GeForce GT 755M is used in Laptops, and Tesla C2070 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GT 755M is build with Kepler architecture, and Tesla C2070 - with Fermi.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GT 755M is 406 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
- GeForce GT 755M is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and Tesla C2070 - by 40 nm process technology.
- Memory clock speed of GeForce GT 755M is 2412 MHz higher, than Tesla C2070.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 7−8 | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 9−10 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 100% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Battlefield 5 is 118% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 140−150 | 210−220 |
medium / 768p | 110−120 | 180−190 |
ultra / 1080p | 55−60 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 60−65 |
4K / 2160p | 27−30 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 85−90 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 62% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 28% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 35−40 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Dota 2 is 56% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
high / 1080p | 9−10 | 20−22 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | 4−5 | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Far Cry 5 is 100% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 10−12 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 65−70 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | 24−27 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Fortnite is 80% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
high / 1080p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 2−3 | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Forza Horizon 4 is 114% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 55−60 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 80−85 |
high / 1080p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Grand Theft Auto V is 66% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
high / 1080p | 5−6 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Metro Exodus is 128% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 90−95 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 80−85 | − |
medium / 1080p | 95−100 | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Minecraft is 18% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
high / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 35−40 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 39% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | 8−9 | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
medium / 1080p | 10−12 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in Red Dead Redemption 2 is 72% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 27−30 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 10−11 | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | 6−7 | 6−7 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt is 100% more, than GeForce GT 755M. | ||
low / 768p | 85−90 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 45−50 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 35−40 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Tesla C2070 in World of Tanks is 29% more, than GeForce GT 755M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GT 755M | Tesla C2070 | |
Architecture | Kepler | Fermi |
Code name | N14P- | GF100 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 25 June 2013 | 25 July 2011 |
Pipelines | 384 | 448 |
Core clock speed | 980 MHz | 574 MHz |
Transistor count | 1,270 million | 3,100 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 31.36 | 32.14 |
Floating-point performance | 752.6 gflops | 1,030.4 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 5400 MHz | 2988 MHz |
Memory bandwidth | 86.4 GB/s | 143.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 API | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
CUDA | + | 2.0 |
Bus support | PCI Express 3.0, PCI Express 2.0 | |
HDMI | + | |
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 27 Mh/s | |
Laptop size | medium sized | |
Standard memory configuration | GDDR5 | |
eDP 1.2 signal support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
LVDS signal support | Up to 1920x1200 | |
DisplayPort Multimode (DP++) support | Up to 3840x2160 | |
HDCP content protection | + | |
7.1 channel HD audio on HDMI | + | |
TrueHD and DTS-HD audio bitstreaming | + | |
H.264, VC1, MPEG2 1080p video decoder | + | |
Optimus | + | |
Blu-Ray 3D Support | + | |
3D Vision / 3DTV Play | + | |
Check Price |