FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GTS 160M
When choosing between FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTS 160M, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTS 160M.
FireStream 9250
GeForce GTS 160M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTS 160M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9250 | GeForce GTS 160M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 60 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 has 150% more power consumption, than GeForce GTS 160M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTS 160M have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTS 160M - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce GTS 160M - with G9x.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 160M is 875 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTS 160M are manufactured by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | − |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 203% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Dota 2 is 124% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Fortnite is 136% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Grand Theft Auto V is 193% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Minecraft is 64% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
low / 768p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | − |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in World of Tanks is 108% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9250 | GeForce GTS 160M | |
Architecture | TeraScale | G9x |
Code name | RV770 | N10E-GS1 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 2 March 2009 |
Pipelines | 800 | 64 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Transistor count | 956 million | 505 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 19 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | 192 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 51 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 64 | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | large | |
Gigaflops | 288 | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
Power management | 8.0 | |
Check Price |