GeForce 820A vs GeForce GTS 160M
In this comparison between GeForce 820A and GeForce GTS 160M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce 820A will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTS 160M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce 820A
GeForce GTS 160M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTS 160M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M here:
Main Specs
GeForce 820A | GeForce GTS 160M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 15 Watt | 60 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTS 160M has 300% more power consumption, than GeForce 820A.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce 820A and GeForce GTS 160M have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- GeForce 820A is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTS 160M - in Laptops.
- GeForce 820A is build with Fermi 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTS 160M - with G9x.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 160M is 725 MHz higher, than GeForce 820A.
- GeForce 820A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTS 160M - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce 820A and GeForce GTS 160M have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce 820A and GeForce GTS 160M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
GeForce 820A and GeForce GTS 160M have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
GeForce 820A and GeForce GTS 160M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce 820A and GeForce GTS 160M have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce 820A and GeForce GTS 160M have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
GeForce 820A and GeForce GTS 160M have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
GeForce 820A and GeForce GTS 160M have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
low / 720p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
GeForce 820A and GeForce GTS 160M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
GeForce 820A and GeForce GTS 160M have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. |
Full Specs
GeForce 820A | GeForce GTS 160M | |
Architecture | Fermi 2.0 | G9x |
Code name | GF117 | N10E-GS1 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 17 March 2014 | 2 March 2009 |
Pipelines | 96 | 64 |
Core clock speed | 775 MHz | 1500 MHz |
Transistor count | 585 million | 505 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
Texture fill rate | 12.40 | 19 billion/sec |
Floating-point performance | 297.6 gflops | 192 gflops |
Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1800 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s | 51 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | 2.1 | + |
CUDA cores | 64 | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | large | |
Gigaflops | 288 | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
Power management | 8.0 | |
Check Price |