GeForce 920A vs GeForce GTS 160M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce 920A and GeForce GTS 160M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce 920A and GeForce GTS 160M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce 920A
GeForce GTS 160M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTS 160M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce 920A | GeForce GTS 160M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 33 Watt | 60 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Memory type | DDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 2 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTS 160M has 81% more power consumption, than GeForce 920A.
- GeForce 920A is connected by PCIe 3.0 x8, and GeForce GTS 160M uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce 920A has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 160M.
- GeForce 920A is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTS 160M - in Laptops.
- GeForce 920A is build with Kepler 2.0 architecture, and GeForce GTS 160M - with G9x.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 160M is 546 MHz higher, than GeForce 920A.
- GeForce 920A is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTS 160M - by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 920A and GeForce GTS 160M have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 920A and GeForce GTS 160M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| GeForce 920A and GeForce GTS 160M have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GeForce 920A and GeForce GTS 160M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 920A and GeForce GTS 160M have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce 920A and GeForce GTS 160M have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| GeForce 920A and GeForce GTS 160M have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| GeForce 920A and GeForce GTS 160M have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| GeForce 920A and GeForce GTS 160M have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| GeForce 920A and GeForce GTS 160M have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce 920A | GeForce GTS 160M | |
| Architecture | Kepler 2.0 | G9x |
| Code name | GK208B | N10E-GS1 |
| Type | Desktop | Laptop |
| Release date | 13 March 2015 | 2 March 2009 |
| Pipelines | 384 | 64 |
| Core clock speed | 954 MHz | 1500 MHz |
| Transistor count | 915 million | 505 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 30.53 | 19 billion/sec |
| Floating-point performance | 441.6 gflops | 192 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 2002 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 16.02 GB/s | 51 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 5.1 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | N/A |
| CUDA | 3.5 | + |
| CUDA cores | 64 | |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Gigaflops | 288 | |
| MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
| Power management | 8.0 | |
| Check Price |