GeForce GTS 160M vs GeForce GTX 285
In this comparison between GeForce GTS 160M and GeForce GTX 285 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTS 160M will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 285 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTS 160M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTS 160M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTS 160M
GeForce GTX 285
Power consumption (TDP)
60 Watt
204 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
2x 6-pin
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
1 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTX 285 has 240% more power consumption, than GeForce GTS 160M.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
GeForce GTS 160M and GeForce GTX 285 have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
GeForce GTS 160M is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 285 - in Desktops.
GeForce GTS 160M is build with G9x architecture, and GeForce GTX 285 - with Tesla 2.0.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 160M is 24 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 285.
GeForce GTS 160M and GeForce GTX 285 are manufactured by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
7−8
ultra / 1080p
−
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
1−2
16−18
medium / 1080p
0−1
9−10
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1600% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
10−11
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
24−27
medium / 1080p
−
12−14
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
60−65
140−150
medium / 768p
27−30
110−120
ultra / 1080p
7−8
55−60
QHD / 1440p
−
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
high / 768p
16−18
85−90
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 260% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
0−1
20−22
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than GeForce GTX 285.
low / 768p
45−50
80−85
medium / 768p
10−11
60−65
ultra / 1080p
0−1
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in Dota 2 is 148% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
8−9
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
0−1
20−22
medium / 1080p
−
9−10
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
10−12
low / 720p
21−24
60−65
medium / 1080p
0−1
24−27
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in Fortnite is 181% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
0−1
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
low / 720p
0−1
27−30
medium / 1080p
0−1
14−16
low / 768p
18−20
55−60
medium / 768p
−
45−50
high / 1080p
0−1
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
6−7
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
5−6
ultra / 1080p
−
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
12−14
medium / 1080p
−
7−8
low / 768p
75−80
95−100
high / 1080p
27−30
90−95
ultra / 1080p
−
80−85
medium / 1080p
−
90−95
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in Minecraft is 79% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 720p
8−9
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 300% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
12−14
medium / 1080p
−
10−12
low / 768p
0−1
24−27
medium / 768p
−
16−18
high / 1080p
−
10−11
ultra / 1080p
−
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 768p
45−50
85−90
medium / 768p
14−16
45−50
ultra / 1080p
0−1
20−22
high / 768p
12−14
35−40
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 285 in World of Tanks is 128% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTS 160M
GeForce GTX 285
Architecture
G9x
Tesla 2.0
Code name
N10E-GS1
GT200B
Type
Laptop
Desktop
Release date
2 March 2009
23 December 2008
Pipelines
64
240
Core clock speed
1500 MHz
1476 MHz
Transistor count
505 million
1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
55 nm
Texture fill rate
19 billion/sec
51.8 billion/sec
Floating-point performance
192 gflops
708.5 gflops
Length
10.5" (267 mm) (26.7 cm)
Memory bus width
256 Bit
512 Bit
Memory clock speed
1242 MHz
Memory bandwidth
51 GB/s
159.0 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model
4.0
4.0
OpenGL
2.1
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
CUDA
+
+
CUDA cores
64
240
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0
Height
4.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
SLI options
2-way
+
Multi monitor support
+
HDMI
+
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
S/PDIF
Laptop size
large
High Dynamic-Range Lighting (HDRR)
128bit
Gigaflops
288
MXM Type
MXM 3.0 Type-B
Power management
8.0
Check Price
Check Price