GeForce GTS 160M vs GRID K160Q
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTS 160M and GRID K160Q. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTS 160M and GRID K160Q. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GRID K160Q
GeForce GTS 160M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTS 160M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTS 160M | GRID K160Q | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 130 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GRID K160Q has 116% more power consumption, than GeForce GTS 160M.
- GeForce GTS 160M is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GRID K160Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTS 160M and GRID K160Q have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- GeForce GTS 160M is used in Laptops, and GRID K160Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTS 160M is build with G9x architecture, and GRID K160Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 160M is 650 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
- GeForce GTS 160M is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GRID K160Q - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 800% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTS 160M and GRID K160Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 135% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
GeForce GTS 160M and GRID K160Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Dota 2 is 79% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
medium / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Fortnite is 90% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 118% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Minecraft is 32% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 175% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in World of Tanks is 68% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTS 160M | GRID K160Q | |
Architecture | G9x | Kepler |
Code name | N10E-GS1 | GK107 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 2 March 2009 | 28 June 2013 |
Pipelines | 64 | 192 |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 850 MHz |
Transistor count | 505 million | 1,270 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 19 billion/sec | 13.60 |
Floating-point performance | 192 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 51 GB/s | 28.51 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
CUDA | + | 3.0 |
CUDA cores | 64 | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | large | |
Gigaflops | 288 | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
Power management | 8.0 | |
Check Price |