GeForce GTS 160M vs Iris Plus Graphics 650
When choosing between GeForce GTS 160M and Iris Plus Graphics 650, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTS 160M and Iris Plus Graphics 650.
GeForce GTS 160M and Iris Plus Graphics 650 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTS 160M and Iris Plus Graphics 650 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M or Iris Plus Graphics 650 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTS 160M
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Power consumption (TDP)
60 Watt
15 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x1
Memory type
GDDR3
DDR3L/LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
32 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTS 160M has 300% more power consumption, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
GeForce GTS 160M is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 uses PCIe 3.0 x1 interface.
Iris Plus Graphics 650 has 31 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 160M.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce GTS 160M is build with G9x architecture, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - with Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 160M is 1200 MHz higher, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
GeForce GTS 160M is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Iris Plus Graphics 650 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
8−9
ultra / 1080p
−
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
1−2
18−20
medium / 1080p
0−1
10−11
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1800% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
30−33
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
60−65
150−160
medium / 768p
27−30
120−130
ultra / 1080p
7−8
60−65
QHD / 1440p
−
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
high / 768p
16−18
90−95
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 285% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
0−1
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Plus Graphics 650.
low / 768p
45−50
85−90
medium / 768p
10−11
65−70
ultra / 1080p
0−1
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Dota 2 is 165% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
10−11
ultra / 1080p
−
9−10
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
0−1
21−24
medium / 1080p
−
10−11
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
low / 720p
21−24
65−70
medium / 1080p
0−1
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Fortnite is 204% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
0−1
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
0−1
30−35
medium / 1080p
0−1
16−18
low / 768p
18−20
60−65
medium / 768p
−
50−55
high / 1080p
0−1
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Grand Theft Auto V is 226% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
5−6
ultra / 1080p
−
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
low / 720p
0−1
14−16
medium / 1080p
−
7−8
low / 768p
75−80
95−100
high / 1080p
27−30
90−95
ultra / 1080p
−
85−90
medium / 1080p
−
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in Minecraft is 79% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 720p
8−9
35−40
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
14−16
medium / 1080p
−
12−14
low / 768p
0−1
30−35
medium / 768p
−
20−22
high / 1080p
−
10−12
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 768p
45−50
90−95
medium / 768p
14−16
45−50
ultra / 1080p
0−1
21−24
high / 768p
12−14
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Plus Graphics 650 in World of Tanks is 140% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTS 160M
Iris Plus Graphics 650
Architecture
G9x
Gen. 9.5 Kaby Lake
Code name
N10E-GS1
Kaby Lake GT3e
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
2 March 2009
3 January 2017
Pipelines
64
48
Core clock speed
1500 MHz
300 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
Transistor count
505 million
189 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
19 billion/sec
55.20
Floating-point performance
192 gflops
883 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
64/128 Bit
Memory bandwidth
51 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
4.0
6.4
OpenGL
2.1
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.1
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.103
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
64
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0
SLI options
2-way
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Laptop size
large
Quick Sync
+
Gigaflops
288
MXM Type
MXM 3.0 Type-B
Power management
8.0
Check Price
Check Price