GeForce GTS 160M vs Quadro FX 3800
When comparing GeForce GTS 160M and Quadro FX 3800, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTS 160M and Quadro FX 3800 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro FX 3800
GeForce GTS 160M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTS 160M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTS 160M | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 108 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- Quadro FX 3800 has 80% more power consumption, than GeForce GTS 160M.
- Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
- GeForce GTS 160M and Quadro FX 3800 have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- GeForce GTS 160M is used in Laptops, and Quadro FX 3800 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTS 160M is build with G9x architecture, and Quadro FX 3800 - with Tesla 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 160M is 900 MHz higher, than Quadro FX 3800.
- GeForce GTS 160M and Quadro FX 3800 are manufactured by 55 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 10−11 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 900% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTS 160M and Quadro FX 3800 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 135% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GeForce GTS 160M and Quadro FX 3800 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Dota 2 is 89% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Fortnite is 90% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Grand Theft Auto V is 118% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in Minecraft is 32% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 175% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
| high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Quadro FX 3800 in World of Tanks is 68% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTS 160M | Quadro FX 3800 | |
| Architecture | G9x | Tesla 2.0 |
| Code name | N10E-GS1 | GT200B |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 2 March 2009 | 30 March 2009 |
| Pipelines | 64 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 600 MHz |
| Transistor count | 505 million | 1,400 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 55 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 19 billion/sec | 38.40 |
| Floating-point performance | 192 gflops | 462.3 gflops |
| Length | 198 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 51 GB/s | 51.2 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 11.1 (10_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 4.0 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 3.3 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
| CUDA | + | 1.3 |
| CUDA cores | 64 | |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Gigaflops | 288 | |
| MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
| Power management | 8.0 | |
| Check Price |