GeForce GTS 160M vs Quadro K4000

If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTS 160M and Quadro K4000, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTS 160M stacks up against Quadro K4000, check out specs charts below.

GeForce GTS 160M Check Price

Quadro K4000 Check Price

GeForce GTS 160M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Note: GeForce GTS 160M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M here:

GeForce GTS 160M Laptops

Main Specs

	GeForce GTS 160M	Quadro K4000
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt	80 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors		1x 6-pin
Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	3 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K4000 has 33% more power consumption, than GeForce GTS 160M.
Both video cards are using PCIe 2.0 x16 interface connection to a motherboard.
Quadro K4000 has 2 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 160M.
GeForce GTS 160M is used in Laptops, and Quadro K4000 - in Desktops.
GeForce GTS 160M is build with G9x architecture, and Quadro K4000 - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 160M is 690 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000.
GeForce GTS 160M is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K4000 - by 28 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
QHD / 1440p	0−1	3−4
low / 720p	1−2	27−30
medium / 1080p	0−1	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2700% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	5−6
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	−	24−27
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K4000.
low / 768p	60−65	200−210
medium / 768p	27−30	170−180
ultra / 1080p	7−8	90−95
QHD / 1440p	−	50−55
4K / 2160p	−	30−33
high / 768p	16−18	130−140
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 439% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
low / 768p	70−75	55−60
ultra / 1080p	0−1	35−40
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro K4000.
low / 768p	45−50	100−110
medium / 768p	10−11	90−95
ultra / 1080p	0−1	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Dota 2 is 237% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	0−1	35−40
medium / 1080p	−	16−18
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	16−18
low / 720p	21−24	90−95
medium / 1080p	0−1	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Fortnite is 318% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	0−1	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	7−8
low / 720p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	0−1	24−27
low / 768p	18−20	80−85
medium / 768p	−	70−75
high / 1080p	0−1	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	2−3
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 331% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	9−10
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	0−1	24−27
medium / 1080p	−	12−14
low / 768p	75−80	110−120
high / 1080p	27−30	−
ultra / 1080p	−	100−110
medium / 1080p	−	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	16−18
low / 720p	8−9	50−55
medium / 1080p	−	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 550% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	24−27
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 768p	0−1	50−55
medium / 768p	−	30−35
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	8−9
low / 768p	45−50	100−105
medium / 768p	14−16	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	30−35
high / 768p	12−14	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000 in World of Tanks is 188% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTS 160M	Quadro K4000
Architecture	G9x	Kepler
Code name	N10E-GS1	GK106
Type	Laptop	Workstation
Release date	2 March 2009	1 March 2013
Pipelines	64	768
Core clock speed	1500 MHz	810 MHz
Transistor count	505 million	2,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	19 billion/sec	51.84
Floating-point performance	192 gflops	1,244 gflops
Length		241 mm
Memory bus width	256 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed		5616 MHz
Memory bandwidth	51 GB/s	134.8 GB/s
Shared memory	-
DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	4.0	5.1
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA	+	3.0
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)		0.21 kh/s
CUDA cores	64
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0
SLI options	2-way
HDMI	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	S/PDIF
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		61 Mh/s
Laptop size	large
Gigaflops	288
MXM Type	MXM 3.0 Type-B
Power management	8.0
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTS 160M vs Quadro K4000

GeForce GTS 160M is a Laptop Graphics Card

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares