GeForce GTS 160M vs Quadro K4000M

When comparing GeForce GTS 160M and Quadro K4000M, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTS 160M and Quadro K4000M is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

GeForce GTS 160M Check Price

Quadro K4000M Check Price

GeForce GTS 160M and Quadro K4000M are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: GeForce GTS 160M and Quadro K4000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M or Quadro K4000M here:

GeForce GTS 160M Laptops

Quadro K4000M Laptops

Main Specs

	GeForce GTS 160M	Quadro K4000M
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt	100 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	MXM-B (3.0)
Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

Quadro K4000M has 66% more power consumption, than GeForce GTS 160M.
GeForce GTS 160M is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Quadro K4000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
Quadro K4000M has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 160M.
GeForce GTS 160M is used in Laptops, and Quadro K4000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTS 160M is build with G9x architecture, and Quadro K4000M - with Kepler.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 160M is 900 MHz higher, than Quadro K4000M.
GeForce GTS 160M is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Quadro K4000M - by 28 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	10−11
ultra / 1080p	−	6−7
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	1−2	21−24
medium / 1080p	0−1	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2100% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	35−40
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
low / 768p	50−55	45−50
high / 1080p	45−50	−
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Quadro K4000M.
low / 768p	60−65	170−180
medium / 768p	27−30	140−150
ultra / 1080p	7−8	70−75
QHD / 1440p	−	40−45
4K / 2160p	−	30−33
high / 768p	16−18	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 350% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
low / 768p	70−75	55−60
ultra / 1080p	0−1	27−30
medium / 1080p	45−50	45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Quadro K4000M.
low / 768p	45−50	95−100
medium / 768p	10−11	75−80
ultra / 1080p	0−1	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Dota 2 is 200% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
4K / 2160p	−	4−5
low / 720p	0−1	27−30
medium / 1080p	−	12−14
high / 1080p	−	18−20
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	21−24	75−80
medium / 1080p	0−1	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Fortnite is 250% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	0−1	18−20
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
low / 720p	0−1	35−40
medium / 1080p	0−1	20−22
low / 768p	18−20	65−70
medium / 768p	−	60−65
high / 1080p	0−1	20−22
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 252% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	7−8
ultra / 1080p	−	5−6
4K / 2160p	−	1−2
low / 720p	0−1	20−22
medium / 1080p	−	9−10
low / 768p	75−80	100−110
high / 1080p	27−30	−
ultra / 1080p	−	90−95
medium / 1080p	−	95−100
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in Minecraft is 36% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	18−20
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	8−9	40−45
medium / 1080p	−	20−22
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 425% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	18−20
medium / 1080p	−	12−14
low / 768p	0−1	35−40
medium / 768p	−	24−27
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 768p	45−50	90−95
medium / 768p	14−16	50−55
ultra / 1080p	0−1	27−30
high / 768p	12−14	45−50
The average gaming FPS of Quadro K4000M in World of Tanks is 156% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTS 160M	Quadro K4000M
Architecture	G9x	Kepler
Code name	N10E-GS1	N14E-Q3
Type	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	2 March 2009	1 June 2012
Pipelines	64	960
Core clock speed	1500 MHz	600 MHz
Transistor count	505 million	3,540 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	19 billion/sec	48.08
Floating-point performance	192 gflops	1,154 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed		2800 MHz
Memory bandwidth	51 GB/s	89.6 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-
DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	4.0	5.1
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.1.126
CUDA	+	+
CUDA cores	64
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0
SLI options	2-way
HDMI	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	S/PDIF
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		37 Mh/s
Laptop size	large	large
Optimus		+
Gigaflops	288
MXM Type	MXM 3.0 Type-B
Power management	8.0
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTS 160M vs Quadro K4000M

GeForce GTS 160M and Quadro K4000M are Laptop Graphics Cards

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares