GeForce GTS 160M vs Radeon Pro 450
In this comparison between GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon Pro 450 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTS 160M will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 450 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon Pro 450 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon Pro 450 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M or Radeon Pro 450 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTS 160M
Radeon Pro 450
Power consumption (TDP)
60 Watt
35 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTS 160M has 71% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 450.
GeForce GTS 160M is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 450 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Radeon Pro 450 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 160M.
GeForce GTS 160M is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro 450 - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTS 160M is build with G9x architecture, and Radeon Pro 450 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 160M is 700 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 450.
GeForce GTS 160M is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 450 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
1−2
27−30
medium / 1080p
0−1
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2700% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
5−6
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
0−1
45−50
medium / 1080p
−
24−27
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro 450.
low / 768p
60−65
200−210
medium / 768p
27−30
170−180
ultra / 1080p
7−8
90−95
QHD / 1440p
−
50−55
4K / 2160p
−
30−33
high / 768p
16−18
130−140
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 439% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
0−1
35−40
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro 450.
low / 768p
45−50
100−110
medium / 768p
10−11
90−95
ultra / 1080p
0−1
60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Dota 2 is 237% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
0−1
35−40
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
18−20
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
21−24
90−95
medium / 1080p
0−1
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Fortnite is 318% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
0−1
24−27
ultra / 1080p
−
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
8−9
low / 720p
0−1
45−50
medium / 1080p
0−1
27−30
low / 768p
18−20
80−85
medium / 768p
−
70−75
high / 1080p
0−1
27−30
ultra / 1080p
−
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Grand Theft Auto V is 331% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
9−10
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
0−1
27−30
medium / 1080p
−
12−14
low / 768p
75−80
110−120
high / 1080p
27−30
−
ultra / 1080p
−
100−110
medium / 1080p
−
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
16−18
low / 720p
8−9
50−55
medium / 1080p
−
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 550% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
9−10
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
24−27
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 768p
0−1
50−55
medium / 768p
−
30−35
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
low / 768p
45−50
100−105
medium / 768p
14−16
60−65
ultra / 1080p
0−1
30−35
high / 768p
12−14
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 450 in World of Tanks is 188% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTS 160M
Radeon Pro 450
Architecture
G9x
Polaris
Code name
N10E-GS1
Polaris 11
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
2 March 2009
27 October 2016
Pipelines
64
640
Core clock speed
1500 MHz
800 MHz
Transistor count
505 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
19 billion/sec
32.00
Floating-point performance
192 gflops
1,024 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5080 MHz
Memory bandwidth
51 GB/s
81.28 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
4.0
6.4
OpenGL
2.1
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
N/A
1.2.131
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
CUDA cores
64
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0
SLI options
2-way
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
127 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
large
Gigaflops
288
MXM Type
MXM 3.0 Type-B
Power management
8.0
Check Price
Check Price