GeForce GTS 160M vs Radeon Pro 460

In this comparison between GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon Pro 460 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTS 160M will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 460 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GeForce GTS 160M Check Price

Radeon Pro 460 Check Price

GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon Pro 460 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon Pro 460 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M or Radeon Pro 460 here:

GeForce GTS 160M Laptops

Radeon Pro 460 Laptops

Main Specs

	GeForce GTS 160M	Radeon Pro 460
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt	35 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors		None
Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTS 160M has 71% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro 460.
GeForce GTS 160M is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 460 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Radeon Pro 460 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 160M.
GeForce GTS 160M is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro 460 - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTS 160M is build with G9x architecture, and Radeon Pro 460 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 160M is 600 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 460.
GeForce GTS 160M is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 460 - by 14 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
low / 720p	1−2	35−40
medium / 1080p	0−1	21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	24−27
QHD / 1440p	0−1	7−8
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	0−1	60−65
medium / 1080p	−	30−35
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	50−55
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
low / 768p	60−65	220−230
medium / 768p	27−30	190−200
ultra / 1080p	7−8	100−110
QHD / 1440p	−	65−70
4K / 2160p	−	35−40
high / 768p	16−18	150−160
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 507% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon Pro 460 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	45−50	110−120
medium / 768p	10−11	100−110
ultra / 1080p	0−1	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Dota 2 is 279% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	18−20
4K / 2160p	−	6−7
low / 720p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	−	21−24
high / 1080p	−	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	−	14−16
low / 720p	21−24	110−120
medium / 1080p	0−1	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Fortnite is 422% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	0−1	30−33
ultra / 1080p	−	21−24
QHD / 1440p	0−1	10−12
low / 720p	0−1	60−65
medium / 1080p	0−1	30−35
low / 768p	18−20	95−100
medium / 768p	−	85−90
high / 1080p	0−1	35−40
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
QHD / 1440p	0−1	4−5
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Grand Theft Auto V is 410% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	10−12
ultra / 1080p	−	8−9
4K / 2160p	−	2−3
low / 720p	0−1	35−40
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 768p	75−80	110−120
high / 1080p	27−30	−
medium / 1080p	−	110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	8−9	65−70
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 737% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	9−10
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	30−35
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
low / 768p	0−1	60−65
medium / 768p	−	40−45
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
4K / 2160p	−	7−8
low / 768p	45−50	90−95
medium / 768p	14−16	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	35−40
high / 768p	12−14	55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 460 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTS 160M	Radeon Pro 460
Architecture	G9x	Polaris
Code name	N10E-GS1	Polaris 11 / Baffin XT
Type	Laptop	Mobile workstation
Release date	2 March 2009	8 August 2016
Pipelines	64	1024
Core clock speed	1500 MHz	900 MHz
Boost Clock		907 MHz
Transistor count	505 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	14 nm
Texture fill rate	19 billion/sec	58.05
Floating-point performance	192 gflops	1,858 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed		5000 MHz
Memory bandwidth	51 GB/s	81.28 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-
DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 (12_0)
Shader Model	4.0	6.4
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	2.0
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	+
FreeSync		+
CUDA cores	64
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0
SLI options	2-way
HDMI	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	S/PDIF
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		227 Mh/s
Laptop size	large	large
Gigaflops	288
MXM Type	MXM 3.0 Type-B
Power management	8.0
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTS 160M vs Radeon Pro 460

GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon Pro 460 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares