GeForce GTS 160M vs Radeon Pro 560X
In this comparison between GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon Pro 560X you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTS 160M will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro 560X will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon Pro 560X are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon Pro 560X are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M or Radeon Pro 560X here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTS 160M
Radeon Pro 560X
Power consumption (TDP)
60 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon Pro 560X has 25% more power consumption, than GeForce GTS 160M.
GeForce GTS 160M is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro 560X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Radeon Pro 560X has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 160M.
GeForce GTS 160M is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro 560X - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTS 160M is build with G9x architecture, and Radeon Pro 560X - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 160M is 593 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro 560X.
GeForce GTS 160M is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro 560X - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
18−20
ultra / 1080p
−
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
5−6
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
1−2
35−40
medium / 1080p
0−1
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
30−33
ultra / 1080p
−
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
9−10
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
0−1
60−65
medium / 1080p
−
30−35
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon Pro 560X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
60−65
220−230
medium / 768p
27−30
190−200
ultra / 1080p
7−8
110−120
QHD / 1440p
−
80−85
4K / 2160p
−
40−45
high / 768p
16−18
160−170
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 525% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
0−1
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon Pro 560X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
45−50
110−120
medium / 768p
10−11
100−110
ultra / 1080p
0−1
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Dota 2 is 279% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
0−1
45−50
medium / 1080p
−
24−27
high / 1080p
−
30−33
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
14−16
low / 720p
21−24
110−120
medium / 1080p
0−1
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Fortnite is 422% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
0−1
30−35
ultra / 1080p
−
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
12−14
4K / 2160p
−
12−14
low / 720p
0−1
65−70
medium / 1080p
0−1
35−40
low / 768p
18−20
100−105
medium / 768p
−
85−90
high / 1080p
0−1
35−40
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
5−6
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Grand Theft Auto V is 436% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
9−10
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
0−1
35−40
medium / 1080p
−
16−18
low / 768p
75−80
110−120
high / 1080p
27−30
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 720p
8−9
65−70
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 737% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
9−10
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
4K / 2160p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
35−40
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
low / 768p
0−1
65−70
medium / 768p
−
40−45
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 768p
45−50
90−95
medium / 768p
14−16
60−65
ultra / 1080p
0−1
40−45
high / 768p
12−14
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro 560X in World of Tanks is 180% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTS 160M
Radeon Pro 560X
Architecture
G9x
Polaris
Code name
N10E-GS1
Polaris 21
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
2 March 2009
5 June 2017
Pipelines
64
1024
Core clock speed
1500 MHz
907 MHz
Transistor count
505 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
19 billion/sec
64.26
Floating-point performance
192 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
5080 MHz
Memory bandwidth
51 GB/s
81.28 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
4.0
6.4
OpenGL
2.1
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
N/A
1.2.131
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
CUDA cores
64
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0
SLI options
2-way
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Laptop size
large
large
Gigaflops
288
MXM Type
MXM 3.0 Type-B
Power management
8.0
Check Price
Check Price