GeForce GTS 160M vs Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTS 160M stacks up against Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU, check out specs charts below.
Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTS 160M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTS 160M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTS 160M | Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 300 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | 2x 8-pin | |
Memory type | GDDR3 | HBM2 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 16 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU has 400% more power consumption, than GeForce GTS 160M.
- GeForce GTS 160M is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU has 15 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 160M.
- GeForce GTS 160M is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTS 160M is build with G9x architecture, and Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU - with GCN 5.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 160M is 500 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU.
- GeForce GTS 160M is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 30−33 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3000% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
4K / 2160p | − | 5−6 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 200−210 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 170−180 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 95−100 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 50−55 |
4K / 2160p | − | 30−33 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 130−140 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 446% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in Dota 2 is 237% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 95−100 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in Fortnite is 340% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 80−85 |
medium / 768p | − | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in Grand Theft Auto V is 331% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
ultra / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | − | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 55−60 |
medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 612% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
medium / 768p | − | 30−35 |
high / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 100−110 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 50−55 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU in World of Tanks is 192% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTS 160M | Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU | |
Architecture | G9x | GCN 5.0 |
Code name | N10E-GS1 | Vega 10 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 2 March 2009 | 26 August 2018 |
Pipelines | 64 | 3584 |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 1000 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | |
Transistor count | 505 million | 12,500 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 14 nm |
Texture fill rate | 19 billion/sec | 336.0 |
Floating-point performance | 192 gflops | |
Length | 267 mm | |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 2048 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 2000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 51 GB/s | 512.0 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (12_1) |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.4 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.125 |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 64 | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
SLI options | 2-way | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | large | |
Gigaflops | 288 | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
Power management | 8.0 | |
Check Price |
Similar compares
- GeForce GTS 160M vs UHD Graphics 615
- GeForce GTS 160M vs Radeon HD 8730M
- Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU vs UHD Graphics 615
- Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU vs Radeon HD 8730M
- GeForce GTS 160M vs Quadro M620
- GeForce GTS 160M vs GeForce GTX 465
- Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU vs Quadro M620
- Radeon Pro V340 MxGPU vs GeForce GTX 465