GeForce GTS 160M vs Radeon Pro Vega 20

In this comparison between GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon Pro Vega 20 you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTS 160M will be the best choice, for others Radeon Pro Vega 20 will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.

GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon Pro Vega 20 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon Pro Vega 20 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M or Radeon Pro Vega 20 here:

Main Specs

  GeForce GTS 160M Radeon Pro Vega 20
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 100 Watt
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Memory type GDDR3 HBM2
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Display Connectors No outputs No outputs
  Check Price Check Price
  • Radeon Pro Vega 20 has 66% more power consumption, than GeForce GTS 160M.
  • GeForce GTS 160M is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro Vega 20 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
  • Radeon Pro Vega 20 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 160M.
  • GeForce GTS 160M is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro Vega 20 - in Mobile workstations.
  • GeForce GTS 160M is build with G9x architecture, and Radeon Pro Vega 20 - with Vega.
  • Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 160M is 685 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro Vega 20.
  • GeForce GTS 160M is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro Vega 20 - by 14 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 0−1 35−40
ultra / 1080p 21−24
QHD / 1440p 0−1 16−18
4K / 2160p 10−11
low / 720p 1−2 60−65
medium / 1080p 0−1 40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro Vega 20 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.

Full Specs

  GeForce GTS 160M Radeon Pro Vega 20
Architecture G9x Vega
Code name N10E-GS1 Vega Mobile
Type Laptop Mobile workstation
Release date 2 March 2009 15 November 2018
Pipelines 64 1280
Core clock speed 1500 MHz 815 MHz
Boost Clock 1283 MHz
Transistor count 505 million
Manufacturing process technology 55 nm 14 nm
Texture fill rate 19 billion/sec 102.6
Floating-point performance 192 gflops
Memory bus width 256 Bit 1024 Bit
Memory clock speed 1480 MHz
Memory bandwidth 51 GB/s 189.4 GB/s
Shared memory - -
DirectX 11.1 (10_0) 12 (12_1)
Shader Model 4.0 6.3
OpenGL 2.1 4.6
OpenCL 1.1 2.0
Vulkan N/A 1.2.131
CUDA +
CUDA cores 64
Bus support PCI-E 2.0
SLI options 2-way
HDMI +
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI S/PDIF
Laptop size large large
Gigaflops 288
MXM Type MXM 3.0 Type-B
Power management 8.0
  Check Price Check Price