GeForce GTS 160M vs Radeon PRO WX 2100

When comparing GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon PRO WX 2100, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon PRO WX 2100 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.

GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon PRO WX 2100 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon PRO WX 2100 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M or Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:

Main Specs

  GeForce GTS 160M Radeon PRO WX 2100
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 35 Watt
Interface PCIe 2.0 x16 PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors None
Memory type GDDR3 GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Display Connectors No outputs 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort
  Check Price Check Price
  • GeForce GTS 160M has 71% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
  • GeForce GTS 160M is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
  • Radeon PRO WX 2100 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 160M.
  • GeForce GTS 160M is used in Laptops, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - in Mobile workstations.
  • GeForce GTS 160M is build with G9x architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
  • GeForce GTS 160M is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - by 14 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks

high / 1080p 0−1 7−8
ultra / 1080p 4−5
QHD / 1440p 0−1 0−1
low / 720p 1−2 18−20
medium / 1080p 0−1 9−10
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1800% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.

Full Specs

  GeForce GTS 160M Radeon PRO WX 2100
Architecture G9x Polaris
Code name N10E-GS1 Polaris 12
Type Laptop Mobile workstation
Release date 2 March 2009 21 March 2018
Pipelines 64 512
Core clock speed 1500 MHz
Boost Clock 1219 MHz
Transistor count 505 million 2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology 55 nm 14 nm
Texture fill rate 19 billion/sec 39.01
Floating-point performance 192 gflops 1,248 gflops
Memory bus width 256 Bit 128 Bit
Memory clock speed 6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth 51 GB/s 48 GB/s
Shared memory - -
DirectX 11.1 (10_0) 12 (12_0)
Shader Model 4.0 6.4
OpenGL 2.1 4.6
OpenCL 1.1 2.0
Vulkan N/A 1.2.131
CUDA +
FreeSync +
CUDA cores 64
Bus support PCI-E 2.0
SLI options 2-way
HDMI +
Maximum VGA resolution 2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI S/PDIF
Laptop size large large
Gigaflops 288
MXM Type MXM 3.0 Type-B
Power management 8.0
  Check Price Check Price