GeForce GTS 160M vs Radeon Pro WX 3200
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon Pro WX 3200. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon Pro WX 3200. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon Pro WX 3200 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon Pro WX 3200 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M or Radeon Pro WX 3200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTS 160M
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Power consumption (TDP)
60 Watt
65 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 8% more power consumption, than GeForce GTS 160M.
GeForce GTS 160M is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Radeon Pro WX 3200 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 160M.
GeForce GTS 160M is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTS 160M is build with G9x architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - with Polaris.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 160M is 418 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
GeForce GTS 160M is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 3200 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
1−2
27−30
medium / 1080p
0−1
16−18
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2700% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
4−5
low / 720p
0−1
45−50
medium / 1080p
−
21−24
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
60−65
190−200
medium / 768p
27−30
160−170
ultra / 1080p
7−8
85−90
QHD / 1440p
−
50−55
4K / 2160p
−
30−33
high / 768p
16−18
120−130
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 410% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
0−1
35−40
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon Pro WX 3200.
low / 768p
45−50
100−110
medium / 768p
10−11
85−90
ultra / 1080p
0−1
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Dota 2 is 231% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
4K / 2160p
−
5−6
low / 720p
0−1
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
16−18
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
16−18
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
low / 720p
21−24
90−95
medium / 1080p
0−1
45−50
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Fortnite is 318% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
0−1
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
18−20
QHD / 1440p
0−1
7−8
low / 720p
0−1
45−50
medium / 1080p
0−1
24−27
low / 768p
18−20
75−80
medium / 768p
−
65−70
high / 1080p
0−1
24−27
ultra / 1080p
−
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
1−2
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 305% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
8−9
ultra / 1080p
−
6−7
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
0−1
24−27
medium / 1080p
−
10−12
low / 768p
75−80
100−110
high / 1080p
27−30
−
ultra / 1080p
−
100−105
medium / 1080p
−
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in Minecraft is 36% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
16−18
low / 720p
8−9
50−55
medium / 1080p
−
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 550% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
9−10
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
24−27
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 768p
0−1
45−50
medium / 768p
−
27−30
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 768p
45−50
95−100
medium / 768p
14−16
55−60
ultra / 1080p
0−1
30−35
high / 768p
12−14
50−55
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 3200 in World of Tanks is 176% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTS 160M
Radeon Pro WX 3200
Architecture
G9x
Polaris
Code name
N10E-GS1
Polaris 12
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
2 March 2009
26 September 2019
Pipelines
64
640
Core clock speed
1500 MHz
1082 MHz
Transistor count
505 million
2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
19 billion/sec
41.44
Floating-point performance
192 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
51 GB/s
64 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
4.0
6.4
OpenGL
2.1
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
N/A
1.2.131
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
64
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0
SLI options
2-way
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Laptop size
large
medium sized
Gigaflops
288
MXM Type
MXM 3.0 Type-B
Power management
8.0
Check Price
Check Price