GeForce GTS 160M vs Radeon Pro WX 4100
When comparing GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon Pro WX 4100, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon Pro WX 4100 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTS 160M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTS 160M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTS 160M
Radeon Pro WX 4100
Power consumption (TDP)
60 Watt
50 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR3
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTS 160M has 20% more power consumption, than Radeon Pro WX 4100.
GeForce GTS 160M is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon Pro WX 4100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Radeon Pro WX 4100 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 160M.
GeForce GTS 160M is used in Laptops, and Radeon Pro WX 4100 - in Desktops.
GeForce GTS 160M is build with G9x architecture, and Radeon Pro WX 4100 - with GCN 4.0.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 160M is 375 MHz higher, than Radeon Pro WX 4100.
GeForce GTS 160M is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon Pro WX 4100 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
18−20
ultra / 1080p
−
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
5−6
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
1−2
35−40
medium / 1080p
0−1
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
30−33
ultra / 1080p
−
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
9−10
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
0−1
60−65
medium / 1080p
−
30−35
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon Pro WX 4100 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
60−65
220−230
medium / 768p
27−30
190−200
ultra / 1080p
7−8
110−120
QHD / 1440p
−
75−80
4K / 2160p
−
40−45
high / 768p
16−18
160−170
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 525% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
0−1
45−50
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon Pro WX 4100 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
45−50
110−120
medium / 768p
10−11
100−110
ultra / 1080p
0−1
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4100 in Dota 2 is 279% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
18−20
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
0−1
45−50
medium / 1080p
−
24−27
high / 1080p
−
30−33
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
−
14−16
low / 720p
21−24
110−120
medium / 1080p
0−1
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4100 in Fortnite is 422% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
0−1
30−35
ultra / 1080p
−
24−27
QHD / 1440p
0−1
12−14
4K / 2160p
−
12−14
low / 720p
0−1
65−70
medium / 1080p
0−1
35−40
low / 768p
18−20
95−100
medium / 768p
−
85−90
high / 1080p
0−1
35−40
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
5−6
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 410% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
9−10
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
0−1
35−40
medium / 1080p
−
16−18
low / 768p
75−80
110−120
high / 1080p
27−30
−
medium / 1080p
−
110−120
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4100 in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 720p
8−9
65−70
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 737% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
9−10
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
4K / 2160p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
35−40
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
low / 768p
0−1
65−70
medium / 768p
−
40−45
high / 1080p
−
21−24
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 768p
45−50
90−95
medium / 768p
14−16
60−65
ultra / 1080p
0−1
40−45
high / 768p
12−14
55−60
The average gaming FPS of Radeon Pro WX 4100 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTS 160M
Radeon Pro WX 4100
Architecture
G9x
GCN 4.0
Code name
N10E-GS1
Baffin
Type
Laptop
Workstation
Release date
2 March 2009
10 November 2016
Pipelines
64
1024
Core clock speed
1500 MHz
1125 MHz
Boost Clock
1201 MHz
Transistor count
505 million
3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
19 billion/sec
76.86
Floating-point performance
192 gflops
2,460 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
51 GB/s
96 GB/s
Shared memory
-
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
4.0
6.4
OpenGL
2.1
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
N/A
1.2.131
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
64
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0
SLI options
2-way
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Laptop size
large
Gigaflops
288
MXM Type
MXM 3.0 Type-B
Power management
8.0
Check Price
Check Price