GeForce GTS 160M vs Radeon R5 430 OEM
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon R5 430 OEM, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTS 160M stacks up against Radeon R5 430 OEM, check out specs charts below.
Radeon R5 430 OEM
GeForce GTS 160M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTS 160M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTS 160M | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | 50 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTS 160M has 20% more power consumption, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- GeForce GTS 160M is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R5 430 OEM uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon R5 430 OEM has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 160M.
- GeForce GTS 160M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTS 160M is build with G9x architecture, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 160M is 770 MHz higher, than Radeon R5 430 OEM.
- GeForce GTS 160M is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R5 430 OEM - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 12−14 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R5 430 OEM. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 21−24 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 160% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Cyberpunk 2077 is 3% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Dota 2 is 106% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Fortnite is 113% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
| medium / 768p | − | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Grand Theft Auto V is 121% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 80−85 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 80−85 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in Minecraft is 54% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| medium / 768p | − | 9−10 |
| high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 430 OEM in World of Tanks is 104% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTS 160M | Radeon R5 430 OEM | |
| Architecture | G9x | GCN 1.0 |
| Code name | N10E-GS1 | Oland |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 2 March 2009 | 30 June 2016 |
| Pipelines | 64 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 730 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 780 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 505 million | 950 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 19 billion/sec | 18.72 |
| Floating-point performance | 192 gflops | 599.0 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 4600 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 51 GB/s | 36.8 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 (11_1) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 64 | |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| SLI options | 2-way | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Gigaflops | 288 | |
| MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
| Power management | 8.0 | |
| Check Price |