GeForce GTS 160M vs Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge
If you are going to buy a new graphics card and are choosing between GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge, there are a couple of things to consider. Cards with more VRAM in general perform better and allow you to play on higher graphics settings. Size also makes a difference. A model with a large heatsink can occupy up to three expansion slots on a motherboard. Be sure you have enough room in your PC case. When comparing GPUs with different architectures, more processing cores and even higher TFLOPS will not always translate to better performance. To help you decide which GPU you need, we have measured frame rates in a number of popular games. For more on how the GeForce GTS 160M stacks up against Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge, check out specs charts below.
GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M or Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTS 160M
Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge
Power consumption (TDP)
60 Watt
12-45 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Memory type
GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTS 160M has 400% more power consumption, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce GTS 160M is build with G9x architecture, and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge - with GCN 1.2/2.0.
GeForce GTS 160M is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
3−4
ultra / 1080p
−
1−2
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
1−2
14−16
medium / 1080p
0−1
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1400% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
7−8
ultra / 1080p
−
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
18−20
medium / 1080p
−
8−9
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge.
low / 768p
60−65
120−130
medium / 768p
27−30
95−100
ultra / 1080p
7−8
45−50
QHD / 1440p
−
24−27
high / 768p
16−18
70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 203% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
low / 768p
70−75
70−75
ultra / 1080p
0−1
20−22
medium / 1080p
45−50
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge.
low / 768p
45−50
75−80
medium / 768p
10−11
55−60
ultra / 1080p
0−1
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge in Dota 2 is 131% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
4−5
ultra / 1080p
−
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
14−16
medium / 1080p
−
5−6
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
QHD / 1440p
−
4−5
low / 720p
21−24
55−60
medium / 1080p
0−1
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge in Fortnite is 159% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
0−1
6−7
ultra / 1080p
−
6−7
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
21−24
medium / 1080p
0−1
9−10
low / 768p
18−20
45−50
high / 1080p
0−1
8−9
ultra / 1080p
−
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
12−14
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge in Grand Theft Auto V is 181% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
2−3
ultra / 1080p
−
0−1
4K / 2160p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
7−8
medium / 1080p
−
3−4
low / 768p
75−80
85−90
high / 1080p
27−30
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge in Minecraft is 45% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
low / 720p
8−9
27−30
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
6−7
ultra / 1080p
−
4−5
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
7−8
low / 768p
0−1
16−18
medium / 768p
−
12−14
high / 1080p
−
6−7
ultra / 1080p
−
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
low / 768p
45−50
70−75
medium / 768p
14−16
35−40
ultra / 1080p
0−1
16−18
high / 768p
12−14
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge in World of Tanks is 88% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTS 160M
Radeon R5 Bristol Ridge
Architecture
G9x
GCN 1.2/2.0
Code name
N10E-GS1
Bristol Ridge
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
2 March 2009
1 June 2016
Pipelines
64
384
Core clock speed
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
800 MHz
Transistor count
505 million
3100 Million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
19 billion/sec
Floating-point performance
192 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
64/128 Bit
Memory bandwidth
51 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX 12 (FL 12_0)
Shader Model
4.0
OpenGL
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
64
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0
SLI options
2-way
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Laptop size
large
medium sized
Gigaflops
288
MXM Type
MXM 3.0 Type-B
Power management
8.0
Check Price
Check Price