GeForce GTS 160M vs Radeon R7 Carrizo
When comparing GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon R7 Carrizo, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon R7 Carrizo is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon R7 Carrizo are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon R7 Carrizo are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M or Radeon R7 Carrizo here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTS 160M
Radeon R7 Carrizo
Power consumption (TDP)
60 Watt
12-35 Watt
Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Memory type
GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTS 160M has 400% more power consumption, than Radeon R7 Carrizo.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce GTS 160M is build with G9x architecture, and Radeon R7 Carrizo - with GCN 1.2/2.0.
GeForce GTS 160M is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 Carrizo - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
2−3
ultra / 1080p
−
0−1
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
1−2
12−14
medium / 1080p
0−1
5−6
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 Carrizo in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
6−7
ultra / 1080p
−
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
16−18
medium / 1080p
−
7−8
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo.
low / 768p
60−65
110−120
medium / 768p
27−30
90−95
ultra / 1080p
7−8
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
24−27
high / 768p
16−18
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 Carrizo in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 182% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
low / 768p
70−75
70−75
ultra / 1080p
0−1
18−20
medium / 1080p
45−50
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon R7 Carrizo.
low / 768p
45−50
70−75
medium / 768p
10−11
50−55
ultra / 1080p
0−1
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 Carrizo in Dota 2 is 113% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
3−4
ultra / 1080p
−
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
14−16
medium / 1080p
−
5−6
high / 1080p
−
10−12
ultra / 1080p
−
6−7
QHD / 1440p
−
4−5
low / 720p
21−24
55−60
medium / 1080p
0−1
12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 Carrizo in Fortnite is 159% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
0−1
7−8
ultra / 1080p
−
6−7
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
20−22
medium / 1080p
0−1
10−11
low / 768p
18−20
45−50
high / 1080p
0−1
7−8
ultra / 1080p
−
3−4
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
12−14
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 Carrizo in Grand Theft Auto V is 162% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p
−
1−2
ultra / 1080p
−
0−1
4K / 2160p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
6−7
medium / 1080p
−
3−4
low / 768p
75−80
85−90
high / 1080p
27−30
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 Carrizo in Minecraft is 45% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
low / 720p
8−9
27−30
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 Carrizo in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
ultra / 1080p
−
3−4
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
6−7
low / 768p
0−1
14−16
medium / 768p
−
10−12
high / 1080p
−
5−6
ultra / 1080p
−
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
0−1
low / 768p
45−50
70−75
medium / 768p
14−16
35−40
ultra / 1080p
0−1
14−16
high / 768p
12−14
27−30
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 Carrizo in World of Tanks is 84% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTS 160M
Radeon R7 Carrizo
Architecture
G9x
GCN 1.2/2.0
Code name
N10E-GS1
Carrizo
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
2 March 2009
4 June 2015
Pipelines
64
512
Core clock speed
1500 MHz
Boost Clock
800 MHz
Transistor count
505 million
2410 Million
Manufacturing process technology
55 nm
28 nm
Texture fill rate
19 billion/sec
Floating-point performance
192 gflops
Memory bus width
256 Bit
64/128 Bit
Memory bandwidth
51 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX 12 (FL 12_0)
Shader Model
4.0
OpenGL
2.1
OpenCL
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
64
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0
SLI options
2-way
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI
S/PDIF
Laptop size
large
medium sized
Gigaflops
288
MXM Type
MXM 3.0 Type-B
Power management
8.0
Check Price
Check Price