GeForce GTS 160M vs Radeon R7 M365X
When choosing between GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon R7 M365X, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon R7 M365X.
Radeon R7 M365X
GeForce GTS 160M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTS 160M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTS 160M | Radeon R7 M365X | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 60 Watt | |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 4 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTS 160M is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R7 M365X uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
- Radeon R7 M365X has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 160M.
- GeForce GTS 160M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 M365X - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTS 160M is build with G9x architecture, and Radeon R7 M365X - with GCN 1.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 160M is 600 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 M365X.
- GeForce GTS 160M is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 M365X - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 10−12 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1000% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon R7 M365X have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 85−90 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 167% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon R7 M365X have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 40−45 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Dota 2 is 96% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
medium / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 1−2 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Fortnite is 113% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Grand Theft Auto V is 150% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
medium / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in Minecraft is 35% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 24−27 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
medium / 768p | − | 6−7 |
high / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 70−75 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 30−33 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 M365X in World of Tanks is 88% more, than GeForce GTS 160M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTS 160M | Radeon R7 M365X | |
Architecture | G9x | GCN 1.0 |
Code name | N10E-GS1 | Litho |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 2 March 2009 | 5 May 2015 |
Pipelines | 64 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 1500 MHz | 900 MHz |
Boost Clock | 825 MHz | |
Transistor count | 505 million | 690 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 19 billion/sec | 23.04 |
Floating-point performance | 192 gflops | 737.3 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 51 GB/s | 64 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | |
Shader Model | 4.0 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.4 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | Not Listed |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
FreeSync | + | |
CUDA cores | 64 | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
SLI options | 2-way | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Audio input for HDMI | S/PDIF | |
Laptop size | large | |
Eyefinity | + | |
HD3D | + | |
PowerTune | + | |
DualGraphics | + | |
ZeroCore | + | |
Switchable graphics | + | |
Mantle | + | |
Compute units | 6 | |
Gigaflops | 288 | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
Power management | 8.0 | |
Check Price |