GeForce GTS 160M vs Radeon R9 M275

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon R9 M275. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon R9 M275. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

GeForce GTS 160M Check Price

Radeon R9 M275 Check Price

GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon R9 M275 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon R9 M275 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M or Radeon R9 M275 here:

GeForce GTS 160M Laptops

Radeon R9 M275 Laptops

Main Specs

	GeForce GTS 160M	Radeon R9 M275
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	4 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTS 160M is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and Radeon R9 M275 uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
Radeon R9 M275 has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 160M.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce GTS 160M is build with G9x architecture, and Radeon R9 M275 - with GCN.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 160M is 575 MHz higher, than Radeon R9 M275.
GeForce GTS 160M is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Radeon R9 M275 - by 28 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	0−1
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	1−2	12−14
medium / 1080p	0−1	3−4
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	5−6
ultra / 1080p	−	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	16−18
medium / 1080p	−	5−6
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 1080p	−	50−55
GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon R9 M275 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	60−65	110−120
medium / 768p	27−30	90−95
ultra / 1080p	7−8	40−45
QHD / 1440p	−	24−27
4K / 2160p	−	18−20
high / 768p	16−18	65−70
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 182% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	18−20
medium / 1080p	45−50	50−55
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 160M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Radeon R9 M275.
low / 768p	45−50	70−75
medium / 768p	10−11	50−55
ultra / 1080p	0−1	24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Dota 2 is 113% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	1−2
4K / 2160p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	10−12
medium / 1080p	−	3−4
high / 1080p	−	9−10
ultra / 1080p	−	5−6
QHD / 1440p	−	1−2
low / 720p	21−24	50−55
medium / 1080p	0−1	12−14
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Fortnite is 136% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	0−1	6−7
ultra / 1080p	−	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	18−20
medium / 1080p	0−1	7−8
low / 768p	18−20	45−50
high / 1080p	0−1	7−8
ultra / 1080p	−	4−5
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
medium / 720p	12−14	35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Grand Theft Auto V is 162% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	3−4
ultra / 1080p	−	1−2
4K / 2160p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	7−8
medium / 1080p	−	4−5
low / 768p	75−80	85−90
high / 1080p	27−30	70−75
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in Minecraft is 50% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	14−16
ultra / 1080p	−	12−14
low / 720p	8−9	24−27
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 212% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	8−9
low / 768p	0−1	16−18
medium / 768p	−	12−14
high / 1080p	−	6−7
ultra / 1080p	−	5−6
low / 768p	45−50	85−90
medium / 768p	14−16	35−40
ultra / 1080p	0−1	14−16
high / 768p	12−14	30−33
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R9 M275 in World of Tanks is 108% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTS 160M	Radeon R9 M275
Architecture	G9x	GCN
Code name	N10E-GS1	Venus
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	2 March 2009	1 August 2014
Pipelines	64	640
Core clock speed	1500 MHz	925 MHz
Boost Clock		925 MHz
Transistor count	505 million	1,500 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	28 nm
Texture fill rate	19 billion/sec	37.00
Floating-point performance	192 gflops	1,184 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed		4500 MHz
Memory bandwidth	51 GB/s	64 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-
DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 (11_1)
Shader Model	4.0	5.1
OpenGL	2.1	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	+
CUDA cores	64
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0
SLI options	2-way
HDMI	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	S/PDIF
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)		122 Mh/s
Laptop size	large	large
Gigaflops	288
MXM Type	MXM 3.0 Type-B
Power management	8.0
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTS 160M vs Radeon R9 M275

GeForce GTS 160M and Radeon R9 M275 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares