GeForce GTS 160M vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7

Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTS 160M and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTS 160M and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.

GeForce GTS 160M Check Price

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 Check Price

GeForce GTS 160M and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Note: GeForce GTS 160M and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 160M or Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 here:

GeForce GTS 160M Laptops

Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 Laptops

Main Specs

	GeForce GTS 160M	Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Power consumption (TDP)	60 Watt
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16
Memory type	GDDR3	DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB
Display Connectors	No outputs
	Check Price	Check Price

Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce GTS 160M is build with G9x architecture, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - with Gen. 11 Ice Lake.
GeForce GTS 160M is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 - by 10 nm process technology.

Game benchmarks


high / 1080p	0−1	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	1−2	30−33
medium / 1080p	0−1	16−18
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3000% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
low / 720p	0−1	45−50
medium / 1080p	−	24−27
low / 768p	50−55	50−55
high / 1080p	45−50	45−50
QHD / 1440p	0−1	0−1
GeForce GTS 160M and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p	60−65	200−210
medium / 768p	27−30	170−180
ultra / 1080p	7−8	90−95
QHD / 1440p	−	50−55
4K / 2160p	−	24−27
high / 768p	16−18	130−140
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 439% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
low / 768p	70−75	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	35−40
medium / 1080p	45−50	55−60
GeForce GTS 160M and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p	45−50	110−120
medium / 768p	10−11	90−95
ultra / 1080p	0−1	60−65
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Dota 2 is 255% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 720p	0−1	35−40
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
high / 1080p	−	21−24
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	−	12−14
low / 720p	21−24	95−100
medium / 1080p	0−1	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Fortnite is 340% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	0−1	24−27
ultra / 1080p	−	18−20
QHD / 1440p	0−1	6−7
low / 720p	0−1	50−55
medium / 1080p	0−1	27−30
low / 768p	18−20	80−85
medium / 768p	−	70−75
high / 1080p	0−1	27−30
ultra / 1080p	−	10−12
QHD / 1440p	0−1	1−2
medium / 720p	12−14	−
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Grand Theft Auto V is 331% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	8−9
ultra / 1080p	−	6−7
4K / 2160p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	27−30
medium / 1080p	−	12−14
low / 768p	75−80	110−120
high / 1080p	27−30	−
ultra / 1080p	−	100−110
medium / 1080p	−	100−110
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
ultra / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 720p	8−9	55−60
medium / 1080p	−	18−20
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 612% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.
high / 1080p	−	12−14
ultra / 1080p	−	7−8
QHD / 1440p	−	0−1
low / 720p	0−1	27−30
medium / 1080p	−	14−16
low / 768p	0−1	50−55
medium / 768p	−	30−35
high / 1080p	−	16−18
ultra / 1080p	−	10−11
4K / 2160p	−	5−6
low / 768p	45−50	90−95
medium / 768p	14−16	60−65
ultra / 1080p	0−1	30−35
high / 768p	12−14	50−55
The average gaming FPS of Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 in World of Tanks is 176% more, than GeForce GTS 160M.

Full Specs

	GeForce GTS 160M	Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7
Architecture	G9x	Gen. 11 Ice Lake
Code name	N10E-GS1	Tiger Lake Xe
Type	Laptop	Laptop
Release date	2 March 2009	15 August 2020
Pipelines	64	96
Core clock speed	1500 MHz
Transistor count	505 million
Manufacturing process technology	55 nm	10 nm
Texture fill rate	19 billion/sec
Floating-point performance	192 gflops
Memory bus width	256 Bit
Memory bandwidth	51 GB/s
Shared memory	-	+
DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	DirectX 12_1
Shader Model	4.0
OpenGL	2.1
OpenCL	1.1
Vulkan	N/A
CUDA	+
CUDA cores	64
Bus support	PCI-E 2.0
SLI options	2-way
HDMI	+
Maximum VGA resolution	2048x1536
Audio input for HDMI	S/PDIF
Laptop size	large
Quick Sync		+
Gigaflops	288
MXM Type	MXM 3.0 Type-B
Power management	8.0
	Check Price	Check Price

GeForce GTS 160M vs Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7

GeForce GTS 160M and Tiger Lake U Xe Graphics G7 are Laptop Graphics Cards

Main Specs

Game benchmarks

Full Specs

Similar compares