FirePro M5950 vs GeForce GTS 360M
In this comparison between FirePro M5950 and GeForce GTS 360M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro M5950 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTS 360M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro M5950 and GeForce GTS 360M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: FirePro M5950 and GeForce GTS 360M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with FirePro M5950 or GeForce GTS 360M here:
Main Specs
FirePro M5950
GeForce GTS 360M
Power consumption (TDP)
35 Watt
38 Watt
Interface
MXM-A (3.0)
MXM-II
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
GDDR5
DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
1 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTS 360M has 8% more power consumption, than FirePro M5950.
FirePro M5950 is connected by MXM-A (3.0), and GeForce GTS 360M uses MXM-II interface.
FirePro M5950 and GeForce GTS 360M have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
FirePro M5950 is used in Mobile workstations, and GeForce GTS 360M - in Laptops.
FirePro M5950 is build with Terascale 2 architecture, and GeForce GTS 360M - with GT2xx.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 360M is 711 MHz higher, than FirePro M5950.
FirePro M5950 and GeForce GTS 360M are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
4−5
0−1
ultra / 1080p
2−3
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
14−16
1−2
medium / 1080p
6−7
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1400% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p
9−10
−
ultra / 1080p
7−8
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
20−22
0−1
medium / 1080p
9−10
−
low / 768p
45−50
50−55
high / 1080p
40−45
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 360M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than FirePro M5950.
low / 768p
120−130
60−65
medium / 768p
95−100
27−30
ultra / 1080p
45−50
7−8
QHD / 1440p
27−30
−
4K / 2160p
18−20
−
high / 768p
70−75
16−18
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 203% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
low / 768p
65−70
70−75
ultra / 1080p
21−24
0−1
medium / 1080p
50−55
45−50
FirePro M5950 and GeForce GTS 360M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
75−80
45−50
medium / 768p
50−55
10−11
ultra / 1080p
30−33
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Dota 2 is 124% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p
5−6
−
ultra / 1080p
4−5
−
4K / 2160p
2−3
−
low / 720p
14−16
0−1
medium / 1080p
6−7
−
high / 1080p
12−14
−
ultra / 1080p
7−8
−
QHD / 1440p
7−8
−
low / 720p
55−60
21−24
medium / 1080p
18−20
0−1
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Fortnite is 159% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p
9−10
0−1
ultra / 1080p
8−9
−
QHD / 1440p
3−4
0−1
4K / 2160p
3−4
−
low / 720p
21−24
0−1
medium / 1080p
10−12
0−1
low / 768p
45−50
18−20
medium / 768p
40−45
−
high / 1080p
8−9
0−1
ultra / 1080p
4−5
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
−
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Grand Theft Auto V is 147% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p
3−4
−
ultra / 1080p
1−2
−
4K / 2160p
0−1
−
low / 720p
9−10
0−1
medium / 1080p
5−6
−
low / 768p
85−90
75−80
high / 1080p
−
27−30
ultra / 1080p
75−80
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in Minecraft is 12% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p
16−18
−
ultra / 1080p
14−16
−
low / 720p
27−30
8−9
medium / 1080p
16−18
−
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
ultra / 1080p
6−7
−
low / 720p
9−10
0−1
medium / 1080p
8−9
−
low / 768p
20−22
0−1
medium / 768p
12−14
−
high / 1080p
7−8
−
ultra / 1080p
5−6
−
4K / 2160p
2−3
−
low / 768p
80−85
45−50
medium / 768p
40−45
14−16
ultra / 1080p
16−18
0−1
high / 768p
30−35
12−14
The average gaming FPS of FirePro M5950 in World of Tanks is 108% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
Full Specs
FirePro M5950
GeForce GTS 360M
Architecture
Terascale 2
GT2xx
Code name
Whistler-XT
N11E-GS1
Type
Mobile workstation
Laptop
Release date
13 April 2011
7 January 2010
Pipelines
480
96
Core clock speed
725 MHz
1436 MHz
Transistor count
716 million
727 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
17.40
17.60
Floating-point performance
696.0 gflops
275.71 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
900 MHz
Memory bandwidth
57 GB/s
57.6 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model
5.0
4.1
OpenGL
4.4
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
96
Bus support
n/a
PCI-E 2.0
SLI options
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
67 Mh/s
Laptop size
medium sized
large
Form factor
MXM-A
Gigaflops
413
MXM Type
MXM 3.0 Type-B
Power management
8.0
Check Price
Check Price