FirePro W7100 vs GeForce GTS 360M
In this comparison between FirePro W7100 and GeForce GTS 360M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people FirePro W7100 will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTS 360M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
FirePro W7100
GeForce GTS 360M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTS 360M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 360M here:
Main Specs
| FirePro W7100 | GeForce GTS 360M | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 400 Watt | 38 Watt |
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | MXM-II |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- FirePro W7100 has 952% more power consumption, than GeForce GTS 360M.
- FirePro W7100 is connected by PCIe 3.0 x16, and GeForce GTS 360M uses MXM-II interface.
- FirePro W7100 has 7 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 360M.
- FirePro W7100 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTS 360M - in Laptops.
- FirePro W7100 is build with GCN 3.0 architecture, and GeForce GTS 360M - with GT2xx.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 360M is 516 MHz higher, than FirePro W7100.
- FirePro W7100 is manufactured by 28 nm process technology, and GeForce GTS 360M - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 21−24 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 10−11 | − |
| low / 720p | 60−65 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 40−45 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 55−60 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| FirePro W7100 and GeForce GTS 360M have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 250−260 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 220−230 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 180−190 | 7−8 |
| QHD / 1440p | 110−120 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 70−75 | − |
| high / 768p | 210−220 | 16−18 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 685% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 55−60 | 45−50 |
| FirePro W7100 and GeForce GTS 360M have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 120−130 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 110−120 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Dota 2 is 313% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 40−45 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 80−85 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 27−30 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 27−30 | − |
| low / 720p | 180−190 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 110−120 | 0−1 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Fortnite is 740% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 60−65 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 30−35 | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | 24−27 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 140−150 | 18−20 |
| medium / 768p | 120−130 | − |
| high / 1080p | 70−75 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 21−24 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | − | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 20−22 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 16−18 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 8−9 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 30−35 | − |
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
| medium / 1080p | 120−130 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in Minecraft is 75% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
| low / 720p | 100−110 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | 18−20 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1212% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 10−11 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 7−8 | − |
| low / 720p | 65−70 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 35−40 | − |
| low / 768p | 130−140 | 0−1 |
| medium / 768p | 85−90 | − |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| ultra / 1080p | 24−27 | − |
| 4K / 2160p | 16−18 | − |
| low / 768p | 90−95 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 60−65 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 50−55 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 60−65 | 12−14 |
| The average gaming FPS of FirePro W7100 in World of Tanks is 188% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
Full Specs
| FirePro W7100 | GeForce GTS 360M | |
| Architecture | GCN 3.0 | GT2xx |
| Code name | Tonga | N11E-GS1 |
| Type | Workstation | Laptop |
| Release date | 12 August 2014 | 7 January 2010 |
| Pipelines | 1792 | 96 |
| Core clock speed | 920 MHz | 1436 MHz |
| Transistor count | 5,000 million | 727 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 103.0 | 17.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 3,297 gflops | 275.71 gflops |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 5000 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 160 GB/s | 57.6 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 12 (12_0) | 11.1 (10_1) |
| Shader Model | 6.3 | 4.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 2.1 |
| OpenCL | 2.0 | 1.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | N/A |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 96 | |
| Bus support | PCIe 3.0 | PCI-E 2.0 |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 362 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Form factor | full height / full length | |
| StereoOutput3D | + | |
| DisplayPort count | 4 | |
| Dual-link DVI support | + | |
| Gigaflops | 413 | |
| MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
| Power management | 8.0 | |
| Check Price |