FireStream 9250 vs GeForce GTS 360M
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTS 360M. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTS 360M. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
FireStream 9250
GeForce GTS 360M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTS 360M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 360M here:
Main Specs
FireStream 9250 | GeForce GTS 360M | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 38 Watt |
Interface | PCIe 2.0 x16 | MXM-II |
Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | None |
Memory type | GDDR3 | DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
Display Connectors | 1x DVI | No outputs |
Check Price |
- FireStream 9250 has 294% more power consumption, than GeForce GTS 360M.
- FireStream 9250 is connected by PCIe 2.0 x16, and GeForce GTS 360M uses MXM-II interface.
- FireStream 9250 and GeForce GTS 360M have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- FireStream 9250 is used in Desktops, and GeForce GTS 360M - in Laptops.
- FireStream 9250 is build with TeraScale architecture, and GeForce GTS 360M - with GT2xx.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 360M is 811 MHz higher, than FireStream 9250.
- FireStream 9250 is manufactured by 55 nm process technology, and GeForce GTS 360M - by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 2−3 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 1−2 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 1−2 |
medium / 1080p | 5−6 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
high / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 5−6 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 35−40 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 360M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 11% more, than FireStream 9250. | ||
low / 768p | 120−130 | 60−65 |
medium / 768p | 95−100 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 45−50 | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 35−40 | − |
4K / 2160p | 18−20 | − |
high / 768p | 70−75 | 16−18 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 203% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
low / 768p | 80−85 | 70−75 |
ultra / 1080p | 18−20 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Cyberpunk 2077 is 11% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
low / 768p | 75−80 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 50−55 | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | 27−30 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Dota 2 is 124% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
high / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
4K / 2160p | 1−2 | − |
low / 720p | 12−14 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
high / 1080p | 10−12 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 3−4 | − |
low / 720p | 50−55 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Fortnite is 136% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 20−22 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 10−11 | 0−1 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | 8−9 | 0−1 |
ultra / 1080p | 3−4 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 40−45 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Grand Theft Auto V is 193% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
high / 1080p | 2−3 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
low / 768p | 85−90 | 75−80 |
high / 1080p | 85−90 | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | 85−90 | − |
4K / 2160p | 75−80 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in Minecraft is 64% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
high / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 12−14 | − |
low / 720p | 27−30 | 8−9 |
medium / 1080p | 14−16 | − |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | − |
4K / 2160p | 0−1 | − |
low / 720p | 7−8 | 0−1 |
medium / 1080p | 7−8 | − |
low / 768p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
medium / 768p | 12−14 | − |
high / 1080p | 6−7 | − |
ultra / 1080p | 4−5 | − |
4K / 2160p | 2−3 | − |
low / 768p | 80−85 | 45−50 |
medium / 768p | 40−45 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | 16−18 | 0−1 |
high / 768p | 30−35 | 12−14 |
The average gaming FPS of FireStream 9250 in World of Tanks is 108% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. |
Full Specs
FireStream 9250 | GeForce GTS 360M | |
Architecture | TeraScale | GT2xx |
Code name | RV770 | N11E-GS1 |
Type | Desktop | Laptop |
Release date | 16 June 2008 | 7 January 2010 |
Pipelines | 800 | 96 |
Core clock speed | 625 MHz | 1436 MHz |
Transistor count | 956 million | 727 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 55 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 25.00 | 17.60 |
Floating-point performance | 1,000.0 gflops | 275.71 gflops |
Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 1986 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 63.55 GB/s | 57.6 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 10.1 (10_1) | 11.1 (10_1) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 4.1 |
OpenGL | 3.3 | 2.1 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Gigaflops | 413 | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
Power management | 8.0 | |
Check Price |