GeForce GTS 360M vs GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
In this comparison between GeForce GTS 360M and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTS 360M will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTS 360M and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTS 360M and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 360M or GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTS 360M
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
Power consumption (TDP)
38 Watt
30 Watt
Interface
MXM-II
PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5
GDDR5, GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
4 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTS 360M has 26% more power consumption, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q.
GeForce GTS 360M is connected by MXM-II, and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q has 3 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 360M.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce GTS 360M is build with GT2xx architecture, and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q - with Turing.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 360M is 416 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q.
GeForce GTS 360M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q - by 12 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
35−40
ultra / 1080p
−
21−24
QHD / 1440p
0−1
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
10−11
low / 720p
1−2
60−65
medium / 1080p
0−1
40−45
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p
−
55−60
ultra / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
18−20
low / 720p
0−1
100−110
medium / 1080p
−
60−65
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
GeForce GTS 360M and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone.
low / 768p
60−65
250−260
medium / 768p
27−30
220−230
ultra / 1080p
7−8
180−190
QHD / 1440p
−
110−120
4K / 2160p
−
70−75
high / 768p
16−18
210−220
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 685% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
low / 768p
70−75
60−65
ultra / 1080p
0−1
−
medium / 1080p
45−50
55−60
GeForce GTS 360M and GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077.
low / 768p
45−50
120−130
medium / 768p
10−11
110−120
ultra / 1080p
0−1
100−110
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Dota 2 is 313% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p
−
45−50
ultra / 1080p
−
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
14−16
low / 720p
0−1
80−85
medium / 1080p
−
45−50
high / 1080p
−
60−65
ultra / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
−
27−30
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
low / 720p
21−24
180−190
medium / 1080p
0−1
110−120
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Fortnite is 740% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p
0−1
60−65
ultra / 1080p
−
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
24−27
low / 720p
0−1
100−110
medium / 1080p
0−1
65−70
low / 768p
18−20
140−150
medium / 768p
−
120−130
high / 1080p
0−1
70−75
ultra / 1080p
−
30−35
QHD / 1440p
0−1
21−24
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
−
20−22
QHD / 1440p
−
16−18
4K / 2160p
−
8−9
low / 720p
0−1
65−70
medium / 1080p
−
30−35
low / 768p
75−80
130−140
high / 1080p
27−30
−
medium / 1080p
−
120−130
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in Minecraft is 75% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 720p
8−9
100−110
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1212% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p
−
24−27
ultra / 1080p
−
16−18
QHD / 1440p
−
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 720p
0−1
65−70
medium / 1080p
−
35−40
low / 768p
0−1
130−140
medium / 768p
−
85−90
high / 1080p
−
45−50
ultra / 1080p
−
24−27
4K / 2160p
−
16−18
low / 768p
45−50
90−95
medium / 768p
14−16
60−65
ultra / 1080p
0−1
50−55
high / 768p
12−14
60−65
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q in World of Tanks is 188% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTS 360M
GeForce GTX 1650 Max Q
Architecture
GT2xx
Turing
Code name
N11E-GS1
N18P-G0 / N18P-G61
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
7 January 2010
23 April 2019
Pipelines
96
1024
Core clock speed
1436 MHz
1020 MHz
Boost Clock
1245 MHz
Transistor count
727 million
4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
12 nm
Texture fill rate
17.60
72.00
Floating-point performance
275.71 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
8000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
57.6 GB/s
112.1 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
12 (12_1)
Shader Model
4.1
6.5
OpenGL
2.1
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.2.140
CUDA
+
7.5
CUDA cores
96
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0
SLI options
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Laptop size
large
medium sized
Gigaflops
413
MXM Type
MXM 3.0 Type-B
Power management
8.0
Check Price
Check Price