GeForce GTS 360M vs GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
In this comparison between GeForce GTS 360M and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTS 360M will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 1650 Ti will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti
![](/static/img/graphics-card.jpg)
GeForce GTS 360M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTS 360M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 360M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTS 360M | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 38 Watt | 75 Watt |
Interface | MXM-II | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | None |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 1650 Ti has 97% more power consumption, than GeForce GTS 360M.
- GeForce GTS 360M is connected by MXM-II, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTS 360M is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTS 360M is build with GT2xx architecture, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti - with Turing.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti is 94 MHz higher, than GeForce GTS 360M.
- GeForce GTS 360M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti - by 12 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 20−22 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6600% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 20−22 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
GeForce GTS 360M and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 250−260 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 220−230 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 190−200 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 120−130 |
4K / 2160p | − | 75−80 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 210−220 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 692% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
GeForce GTS 360M and GeForce GTX 1650 Ti have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 100−110 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Dota 2 is 313% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 85−90 |
medium / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | − | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 190−200 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Fortnite is 786% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 75−80 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 75−80 |
medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in Minecraft is 75% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 100−110 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1212% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
medium / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | − | 90−95 |
high / 1080p | − | 50−55 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 55−60 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 1650 Ti in World of Tanks is 148% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTS 360M | GeForce GTX 1650 Ti | |
Architecture | GT2xx | Turing |
Code name | N11E-GS1 | TU117 |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 7 January 2010 | no data |
Pipelines | 96 | 1024 |
Core clock speed | 1436 MHz | 1530 MHz |
Boost Clock | 1725 MHz | |
Transistor count | 727 million | 4,700 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 12 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.60 | |
Floating-point performance | 275.71 gflops | |
Length | 229 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 8000 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_1) | 12_1 |
Shader Model | 4.1 | |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Gigaflops | 413 | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
Power management | 8.0 | |
Check Price |