GeForce GTS 360M vs GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
In this comparison between GeForce GTS 360M and GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTS 360M will be the best choice, for others GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
GeForce GTS 360M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTS 360M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 360M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTS 360M | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 38 Watt | 170 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-II | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 2x 6-pin |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 2 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM has 347% more power consumption, than GeForce GTS 360M.
- GeForce GTS 360M is connected by MXM-II, and GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 360M.
- GeForce GTS 360M is used in Laptops, and GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTS 360M is build with GT2xx architecture, and GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 360M is 521 MHz higher, than GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM.
- GeForce GTS 360M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 10−11 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 60−65 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 40−45 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 6100% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 55−60 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 18−20 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | − |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTS 360M and GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 250−260 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 220−230 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 180−190 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 110−120 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 70−75 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 210−220 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 685% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | − |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
| GeForce GTS 360M and GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 120−130 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 110−120 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 100−110 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Dota 2 is 313% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 40−45 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 80−85 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| high / 1080p | − | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 27−30 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 180−190 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 110−120 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Fortnite is 740% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 24−27 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 140−150 |
| medium / 768p | − | 120−130 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Grand Theft Auto V is 663% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 16−18 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 8−9 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 130−140 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
| medium / 1080p | − | 120−130 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in Minecraft is 75% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 100−110 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 1212% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 10−11 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 35−40 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 130−140 |
| medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | − | 45−50 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 16−18 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 50−55 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 60−65 |
| The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM in World of Tanks is 188% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTS 360M | GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM | |
| Architecture | GT2xx | Kepler |
| Code name | N11E-GS1 | GK104 |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 7 January 2010 | 27 September 2013 |
| Pipelines | 96 | 1344 |
| Core clock speed | 1436 MHz | 915 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 980 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 727 million | 3,540 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.60 | 109.8 |
| Floating-point performance | 275.71 gflops | 2,634 gflops |
| Length | 241 mm | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6008 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | 192.3 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| CUDA cores | 96 | |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256) | 156 Mh/s | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Gigaflops | 413 | |
| MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
| Power management | 8.0 | |
| Check Price |