GeForce GTS 360M vs GRID K160Q
When comparing GeForce GTS 360M and GRID K160Q, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTS 360M and GRID K160Q is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
GRID K160Q
GeForce GTS 360M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTS 360M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 360M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTS 360M | GRID K160Q | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 38 Watt | 130 Watt |
| Interface | MXM-II | PCIe 3.0 x16 |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 1 GB |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GRID K160Q has 242% more power consumption, than GeForce GTS 360M.
- GeForce GTS 360M is connected by MXM-II, and GRID K160Q uses PCIe 3.0 x16 interface.
- GeForce GTS 360M and GRID K160Q have maximum RAM of 1 GB.
- GeForce GTS 360M is used in Laptops, and GRID K160Q - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTS 360M is build with GT2xx architecture, and GRID K160Q - with Kepler.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 360M is 586 MHz higher, than GRID K160Q.
- GeForce GTS 360M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and GRID K160Q - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 9−10 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 800% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTS 360M and GRID K160Q have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 100−110 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 75−80 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 30−35 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 9−10 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 135% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GeForce GTS 360M and GRID K160Q have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 35−40 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Dota 2 is 79% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 6−7 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 1−2 |
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 40−45 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Fortnite is 90% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 35−40 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | 30−35 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Grand Theft Auto V is 118% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
| high / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| ultra / 1080p | − | 0−1 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 85−90 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 50−55 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in Minecraft is 32% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
| ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 175% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
| QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 1−2 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 3−4 |
| high / 1080p | − | 2−3 |
| 4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 65−70 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 30−35 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 10−11 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 27−30 |
| The average gaming FPS of GRID K160Q in World of Tanks is 68% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTS 360M | GRID K160Q | |
| Architecture | GT2xx | Kepler |
| Code name | N11E-GS1 | GK107 |
| Type | Laptop | Workstation |
| Release date | 7 January 2010 | 28 June 2013 |
| Pipelines | 96 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 1436 MHz | 850 MHz |
| Transistor count | 727 million | 1,270 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.60 | 13.60 |
| Floating-point performance | 275.71 gflops | 326.4 gflops |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 128 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 1782 MHz | |
| Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | 28.51 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | + | 3.0 |
| CUDA cores | 96 | |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Gigaflops | 413 | |
| MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
| Power management | 8.0 | |
| Check Price |