GeForce GTS 360M vs Iris Pro Graphics 5200
When choosing between GeForce GTS 360M and Iris Pro Graphics 5200, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTS 360M and Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
GeForce GTS 360M and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTS 360M and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 360M or Iris Pro Graphics 5200 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTS 360M
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Power consumption (TDP)
38 Watt
45 Watt
Interface
MXM-II
PCIe 1.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5
eDRAM
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
128 MB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 18% more power consumption, than GeForce GTS 360M.
GeForce GTS 360M is connected by MXM-II, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 uses PCIe 1.0 x16 interface.
Iris Pro Graphics 5200 has 127 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 360M.
Both cards are used in Laptops.
GeForce GTS 360M is build with GT2xx architecture, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - with Gen. 7.5 Haswell.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 360M is 1236 MHz higher, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
GeForce GTS 360M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Iris Pro Graphics 5200 - by 22 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
9−10
ultra / 1080p
−
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
1−2
21−24
medium / 1080p
0−1
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 2100% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p
−
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
30−35
medium / 1080p
−
16−18
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
−
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 360M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 10% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
60−65
160−170
medium / 768p
27−30
130−140
ultra / 1080p
7−8
65−70
QHD / 1440p
−
35−40
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
high / 768p
16−18
100−110
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 321% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
0−1
24−27
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 360M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Iris Pro Graphics 5200.
low / 768p
45−50
90−95
medium / 768p
10−11
70−75
ultra / 1080p
0−1
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Dota 2 is 182% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p
−
10−12
ultra / 1080p
−
10−11
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
0−1
24−27
medium / 1080p
−
12−14
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
low / 720p
21−24
70−75
medium / 1080p
0−1
30−35
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Fortnite is 227% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p
0−1
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
low / 720p
0−1
30−35
medium / 1080p
0−1
18−20
low / 768p
18−20
60−65
medium / 768p
−
55−60
high / 1080p
0−1
18−20
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Grand Theft Auto V is 226% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p
−
6−7
ultra / 1080p
−
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
low / 720p
0−1
18−20
medium / 1080p
−
8−9
low / 768p
75−80
100−110
high / 1080p
27−30
95−100
ultra / 1080p
−
85−90
medium / 1080p
−
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in Minecraft is 90% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p
−
18−20
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 720p
8−9
40−45
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 425% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
16−18
medium / 1080p
−
12−14
low / 768p
0−1
30−35
medium / 768p
−
21−24
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
7−8
low / 768p
45−50
90−95
medium / 768p
14−16
50−55
ultra / 1080p
0−1
24−27
high / 768p
12−14
40−45
The average gaming FPS of Iris Pro Graphics 5200 in World of Tanks is 148% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTS 360M
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
Architecture
GT2xx
Gen. 7.5 Haswell
Code name
N11E-GS1
Haswell GT3e
Type
Laptop
Laptop
Release date
7 January 2010
5 June 2013
Pipelines
96
40
Core clock speed
1436 MHz
200 MHz
Boost Clock
1300 MHz
Transistor count
727 million
392 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
22 nm
Texture fill rate
17.60
52.00
Floating-point performance
275.71 gflops
104.0 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
Memory bandwidth
57.6 GB/s
Shared memory
-
+
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
12 (11_1)
Shader Model
4.1
5.1
OpenGL
2.1
4.3
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
1.1.80
CUDA
+
CUDA cores
96
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0
SLI options
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Laptop size
large
medium sized
Quick Sync
+
Gigaflops
413
MXM Type
MXM 3.0 Type-B
Power management
8.0
Check Price
Check Price