GeForce GTS 360M vs Quadro 3000M
In this comparison between GeForce GTS 360M and Quadro 3000M you will find out which graphics card performs better in today's games. Bear in mind that third-party versions may have more efficient cooling and higher clock speeds. This will increase cards' performance, though not by much. In addition to raw power you should also take into account the dimensions. Thicker models simply will not fit into a small mini-ITX case. The resolution of your monitor also affects the choice, since 4K gameplay requires a more powerful GPU. And don't overspend on the graphics card. Other parts of your build may also need to be upgraded, save some money for the CPU or power supply. For some people GeForce GTS 360M will be the best choice, for others Quadro 3000M will be their preference. Study the comparison tables below and make your choice.
GeForce GTS 360M and Quadro 3000M are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTS 360M and Quadro 3000M are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 360M or Quadro 3000M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTS 360M
Quadro 3000M
Power consumption (TDP)
38 Watt
75 Watt
Interface
MXM-II
MXM-B (3.0)
Supplementary power connectors
None
Memory type
DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
No outputs
Check Price
Check Price
Quadro 3000M has 97% more power consumption, than GeForce GTS 360M.
GeForce GTS 360M is connected by MXM-II, and Quadro 3000M uses MXM-B (3.0) interface.
Quadro 3000M has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 360M.
GeForce GTS 360M is used in Laptops, and Quadro 3000M - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTS 360M is build with GT2xx architecture, and Quadro 3000M - with Fermi.
Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 360M is 986 MHz higher, than Quadro 3000M.
GeForce GTS 360M and Quadro 3000M are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
2−3
ultra / 1080p
−
1−2
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
1−2
12−14
medium / 1080p
0−1
4−5
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1200% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
ultra / 1080p
−
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
16−18
medium / 1080p
−
6−7
low / 768p
50−55
50−55
high / 1080p
45−50
40−45
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 360M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
60−65
120−130
medium / 768p
27−30
95−100
ultra / 1080p
7−8
40−45
QHD / 1440p
−
21−24
4K / 2160p
−
16−18
high / 768p
16−18
65−70
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 196% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
low / 768p
70−75
65−70
ultra / 1080p
0−1
20−22
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 360M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 5% more, than Quadro 3000M.
low / 768p
45−50
75−80
medium / 768p
10−11
45−50
ultra / 1080p
0−1
21−24
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Dota 2 is 113% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p
−
2−3
ultra / 1080p
−
2−3
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
0−1
10−12
medium / 1080p
−
4−5
high / 1080p
−
10−11
ultra / 1080p
−
5−6
QHD / 1440p
−
4−5
low / 720p
21−24
50−55
medium / 1080p
0−1
10−12
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Fortnite is 136% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p
0−1
5−6
QHD / 1440p
0−1
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
2−3
low / 720p
0−1
18−20
medium / 1080p
0−1
8−9
low / 768p
18−20
45−50
high / 1080p
0−1
4−5
ultra / 1080p
−
2−3
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
12−14
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Grand Theft Auto V is 162% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p
−
2−3
ultra / 1080p
−
0−1
4K / 2160p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
4−5
medium / 1080p
−
3−4
low / 768p
75−80
85−90
high / 1080p
27−30
80−85
4K / 2160p
−
75−80
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in Minecraft is 60% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
low / 720p
8−9
27−30
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 250% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
low / 720p
0−1
6−7
low / 768p
0−1
10−11
medium / 768p
−
8−9
high / 1080p
−
4−5
ultra / 1080p
−
4−5
4K / 2160p
−
1−2
low / 768p
45−50
75−80
medium / 768p
14−16
35−40
ultra / 1080p
0−1
14−16
high / 768p
12−14
30−33
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 3000M in World of Tanks is 92% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTS 360M
Quadro 3000M
Architecture
GT2xx
Fermi
Code name
N11E-GS1
Fermi
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
7 January 2010
22 February 2011
Pipelines
96
240
Core clock speed
1436 MHz
450 MHz
Transistor count
727 million
1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
40 nm
Texture fill rate
17.60
18.00
Floating-point performance
275.71 gflops
432.0 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
256 Bit
Memory clock speed
625 MHz
Memory bandwidth
57.6 GB/s
80 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
12 (11_0)
Shader Model
4.1
5.1
OpenGL
2.1
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
N/A
CUDA
+
2.1
CUDA cores
96
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0
SLI options
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)
28 Mh/s
Laptop size
large
large
Gigaflops
413
MXM Type
MXM 3.0 Type-B
Power management
8.0
Check Price
Check Price
