GeForce GTS 360M vs Quadro 7000
When comparing GeForce GTS 360M and Quadro 7000, we look primarily at benchmarks and game tests. But it is not only about the numbers. Often you can find third-party models with higher clock speeds, better cooling, or a customizable RGB lighting. Not all of them will have all the features you need. Another thing to consider is the port selection. Most graphics cards have at least one DisplayPort and HDMI interface, but some monitors require DVI. Before you buy, check the TDP of the graphics card - this characteristic will help you estimate the consumption of the graphics card. You may even have to upgrade your PSU to meet its requirements. An important factor when choosing between GeForce GTS 360M and Quadro 7000 is the price. Does the additional cost justify the performance hit? Our comparison should help you make the right decision.
Quadro 7000
GeForce GTS 360M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTS 360M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 360M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTS 360M | Quadro 7000 | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 38 Watt | 204 Watt |
Interface | MXM-II | PCIe 2.0 x16 |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | 6 GB |
Display Connectors | No outputs | 2x DVI, 1x S-Video |
Check Price |
- Quadro 7000 has 436% more power consumption, than GeForce GTS 360M.
- GeForce GTS 360M is connected by MXM-II, and Quadro 7000 uses PCIe 2.0 x16 interface.
- Quadro 7000 has 5 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 360M.
- GeForce GTS 360M is used in Laptops, and Quadro 7000 - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTS 360M is build with GT2xx architecture, and Quadro 7000 - with Fermi 2.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 360M is 785 MHz higher, than Quadro 7000.
- GeForce GTS 360M and Quadro 7000 are manufactured by 40 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 18−20 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 4−5 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 3600% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | − | 30−35 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 50−55 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Call of Duty: Warzone is 4% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 220−230 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 190−200 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 100−110 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 70−75 |
4K / 2160p | − | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 150−160 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 507% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 55−60 |
GeForce GTS 360M and Quadro 7000 have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 110−120 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 100−110 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 70−75 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Dota 2 is 279% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 20−22 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 18−20 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 45−50 |
medium / 1080p | − | 24−27 |
high / 1080p | − | 27−30 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 110−120 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Fortnite is 422% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−33 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 60−65 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 30−35 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 95−100 |
medium / 768p | − | 85−90 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 5−6 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Grand Theft Auto V is 410% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
4K / 2160p | − | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 110−120 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | − |
medium / 1080p | − | 110−120 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in Minecraft is 49% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 737% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 65−70 |
medium / 768p | − | 40−45 |
high / 1080p | − | 21−24 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
4K / 2160p | − | 7−8 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 90−95 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 55−60 |
The average gaming FPS of Quadro 7000 in World of Tanks is 180% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTS 360M | Quadro 7000 | |
Architecture | GT2xx | Fermi 2.0 |
Code name | N11E-GS1 | GF110 |
Type | Laptop | Workstation |
Release date | 7 January 2010 | 2 May 2012 |
Pipelines | 96 | 512 |
Core clock speed | 1436 MHz | 651 MHz |
Transistor count | 727 million | 3,000 million |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 40 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.60 | 41.66 |
Floating-point performance | 275.71 gflops | 1,332 gflops |
Length | 248 mm | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 384 Bit |
Memory clock speed | 3404 MHz | |
Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | 163.4 GB/s |
Shared memory | - | |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_1) | 12 (11_0) |
Shader Model | 4.1 | 5.1 |
OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
OpenCL | 1.1 | 1.1 |
Vulkan | N/A | N/A |
CUDA | + | 2.0 |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Gigaflops | 413 | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
Power management | 8.0 | |
Check Price |