GeForce GTS 360M vs Radeon PRO WX 2100
When choosing between GeForce GTS 360M and Radeon PRO WX 2100, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTS 360M and Radeon PRO WX 2100.
GeForce GTS 360M and Radeon PRO WX 2100 are Laptop Graphics Cards
Note: GeForce GTS 360M and Radeon PRO WX 2100 are only used in laptop graphics. They have lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 360M or Radeon PRO WX 2100 here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTS 360M
Radeon PRO WX 2100
Power consumption (TDP)
38 Watt
35 Watt
Interface
MXM-II
PCIe 3.0 x8
Supplementary power connectors
None
None
Memory type
DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5
GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount
1 GB
2 GB
Display Connectors
No outputs
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort
Check Price
Check Price
GeForce GTS 360M has 8% more power consumption, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
GeForce GTS 360M is connected by MXM-II, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 uses PCIe 3.0 x8 interface.
Radeon PRO WX 2100 has 1 GB more memory, than GeForce GTS 360M.
GeForce GTS 360M is used in Laptops, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - in Mobile workstations.
GeForce GTS 360M is build with GT2xx architecture, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - with Polaris.
GeForce GTS 360M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon PRO WX 2100 - by 14 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Battlefield 5
Call of Duty: Warzone
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive
Cyberpunk 2077
Dota 2
Far Cry 5
Fortnite
Forza Horizon 4
Grand Theft Auto V
Metro Exodus
Minecraft
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS
Red Dead Redemption 2
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
World of Tanks
high / 1080p
0−1
7−8
ultra / 1080p
−
4−5
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
1−2
18−20
medium / 1080p
0−1
9−10
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1800% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p
−
12−14
ultra / 1080p
−
10−12
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
27−30
medium / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 768p
50−55
45−50
high / 1080p
45−50
45−50
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 360M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
60−65
140−150
medium / 768p
27−30
110−120
ultra / 1080p
7−8
55−60
QHD / 1440p
−
30−35
4K / 2160p
−
27−30
high / 768p
16−18
85−90
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 260% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
low / 768p
70−75
55−60
ultra / 1080p
0−1
21−24
medium / 1080p
45−50
45−50
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 360M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon PRO WX 2100.
low / 768p
45−50
85−90
medium / 768p
10−11
60−65
ultra / 1080p
0−1
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Dota 2 is 158% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p
−
9−10
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
4K / 2160p
−
4−5
low / 720p
0−1
21−24
medium / 1080p
−
10−11
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
10−12
low / 720p
21−24
65−70
medium / 1080p
0−1
24−27
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Fortnite is 204% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p
0−1
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
12−14
QHD / 1440p
0−1
2−3
low / 720p
0−1
27−30
medium / 1080p
0−1
14−16
low / 768p
18−20
55−60
medium / 768p
−
50−55
high / 1080p
0−1
14−16
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
QHD / 1440p
0−1
0−1
medium / 720p
12−14
−
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p
−
5−6
ultra / 1080p
−
3−4
4K / 2160p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
14−16
medium / 1080p
−
7−8
low / 768p
75−80
95−100
high / 1080p
27−30
90−95
ultra / 1080p
−
80−85
medium / 1080p
−
95−100
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in Minecraft is 79% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
high / 1080p
−
16−18
ultra / 1080p
−
14−16
low / 720p
8−9
35−40
medium / 1080p
−
18−20
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
ultra / 1080p
−
8−9
QHD / 1440p
−
0−1
low / 720p
0−1
14−16
medium / 1080p
−
10−12
low / 768p
0−1
27−30
medium / 768p
−
18−20
high / 1080p
−
10−11
ultra / 1080p
−
7−8
4K / 2160p
−
6−7
low / 768p
45−50
85−90
medium / 768p
14−16
45−50
ultra / 1080p
0−1
21−24
high / 768p
12−14
35−40
The average gaming FPS of Radeon PRO WX 2100 in World of Tanks is 128% more, than GeForce GTS 360M.
Full Specs
GeForce GTS 360M
Radeon PRO WX 2100
Architecture
GT2xx
Polaris
Code name
N11E-GS1
Polaris 12
Type
Laptop
Mobile workstation
Release date
7 January 2010
21 March 2018
Pipelines
96
512
Core clock speed
1436 MHz
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
Transistor count
727 million
2,200 million
Manufacturing process technology
40 nm
14 nm
Texture fill rate
17.60
39.01
Floating-point performance
275.71 gflops
1,248 gflops
Memory bus width
128 Bit
128 Bit
Memory clock speed
6000 MHz
Memory bandwidth
57.6 GB/s
48 GB/s
Shared memory
-
-
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
12 (12_0)
Shader Model
4.1
6.4
OpenGL
2.1
4.6
OpenCL
1.1
2.0
Vulkan
N/A
1.2.131
CUDA
+
FreeSync
+
CUDA cores
96
Bus support
PCI-E 2.0
SLI options
+
HDMI
+
Maximum VGA resolution
2048x1536
Laptop size
large
large
Gigaflops
413
MXM Type
MXM 3.0 Type-B
Power management
8.0
Check Price
Check Price