GeForce GTS 360M vs Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
When choosing between GeForce GTS 360M and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri, it is worth examining the specifications of the models in detail. Do they meet the recommended requirements of modern games and software? Storage capacity, form factor, TDP, available ports, warranty and manufacturer support are all important. For example, the size of a PC case can limit the maximum thickness and length of the card. Often, instead of the factory overclocked card and RGB backlight, it is better to choose a reference model with a more efficient GPU. And make sure that your current power supply unit has the correct connection pins (using adapters is not recommended). This GPUs compare tool is meant to help you to choose the best graphics card for your build. Let's find out the difference between GeForce GTS 360M and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.
Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri
GeForce GTS 360M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTS 360M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 360M here:
Main Specs
GeForce GTS 360M | Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri | |
Power consumption (TDP) | 38 Watt | |
Interface | MXM-II | |
Supplementary power connectors | None | |
Memory type | DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 | |
Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
Display Connectors | No outputs | |
Check Price |
- GeForce GTS 360M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTS 360M is build with GT2xx architecture, and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri - with GCN.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 360M is 716 MHz higher, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri.
- GeForce GTS 360M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 7−8 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 4−5 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 1−2 | 18−20 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 9−10 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Assassin's Creed Odyssey is 1800% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 768p | 50−55 | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 360M in Call of Duty: Warzone is 6% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 60−65 | 140−150 |
medium / 768p | 27−30 | 110−120 |
ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 55−60 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 30−35 |
4K / 2160p | − | 27−30 |
high / 768p | 16−18 | 85−90 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive is 260% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
low / 768p | 70−75 | 55−60 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
The average gaming FPS of GeForce GTS 360M in Cyberpunk 2077 is 15% more, than Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri. | ||
low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 10−11 | 60−65 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Dota 2 is 158% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 9−10 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
4K / 2160p | − | 4−5 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
low / 720p | 21−24 | 65−70 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 24−27 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Fortnite is 204% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 12−14 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 12−14 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 2−3 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
low / 768p | 18−20 | 55−60 |
medium / 768p | − | 45−50 |
high / 1080p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
medium / 720p | 12−14 | − |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Grand Theft Auto V is 200% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 5−6 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 3−4 |
4K / 2160p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
low / 768p | 75−80 | 95−100 |
high / 1080p | 27−30 | 90−95 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 80−85 |
medium / 1080p | − | 95−100 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in Minecraft is 79% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
high / 1080p | − | 16−18 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 14−16 |
low / 720p | 8−9 | 35−40 |
medium / 1080p | − | 18−20 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS is 362% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. | ||
ultra / 1080p | − | 8−9 |
QHD / 1440p | − | 0−1 |
low / 720p | 0−1 | 14−16 |
medium / 1080p | − | 10−12 |
low / 768p | 0−1 | 27−30 |
medium / 768p | − | 18−20 |
high / 1080p | − | 10−11 |
ultra / 1080p | − | 7−8 |
4K / 2160p | − | 6−7 |
low / 768p | 45−50 | 85−90 |
medium / 768p | 14−16 | 45−50 |
ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 21−24 |
high / 768p | 12−14 | 35−40 |
The average gaming FPS of Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri in World of Tanks is 128% more, than GeForce GTS 360M. |
Full Specs
GeForce GTS 360M | Radeon R7 384 Cores Kaveri | |
Architecture | GT2xx | GCN |
Code name | N11E-GS1 | Kaveri Spectre |
Type | Laptop | Desktop |
Release date | 7 January 2010 | 14 January 2014 |
Pipelines | 96 | 384 |
Core clock speed | 1436 MHz | 720 MHz |
Transistor count | 727 million | |
Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
Texture fill rate | 17.60 | |
Floating-point performance | 275.71 gflops | |
Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | |
Shared memory | - | + |
DirectX | 11.1 (10_1) | DirectX 12 (FL 12_0), Shader 5.2 |
Shader Model | 4.1 | |
OpenGL | 2.1 | |
OpenCL | 1.1 | |
Vulkan | N/A | |
CUDA | + | |
CUDA cores | 96 | |
Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
SLI options | + | |
HDMI | + | |
Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
Laptop size | large | |
Gigaflops | 413 | |
MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
Power management | 8.0 | |
Check Price |