GeForce GTS 360M vs Radeon R8 M535DX
Find out if it is worth upgrading your current GPU setup by comparing GeForce GTS 360M and Radeon R8 M535DX. Here you can take a closer look at graphics cards specs, such as core clock speed, memory type and size, display connectors, etc. The price, overall benchmark and gaming performances are usually defining factors when it comes to choosing between GeForce GTS 360M and Radeon R8 M535DX. Make sure that the graphics card has compatible dimensions and will properly fit in your new or current computer case. Also these graphics cards may have different system power recommendations, so take that into consideration and upgrade your PSU if necessary.
Radeon R8 M535DX
GeForce GTS 360M is a Laptop Graphics Card
Note: GeForce GTS 360M is only used in laptop graphics. It has lower GPU clock speed compared to the desktop variant, which results in lower power consumption, but also 10-30% lower gaming performance. Check available laptop models with GeForce GTS 360M here:
Main Specs
| GeForce GTS 360M | Radeon R8 M535DX | |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 38 Watt | |
| Interface | MXM-II | IGP |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | |
| Memory type | DDR3, GDDR3, GDDR5 | System Shared |
| Maximum RAM amount | 1 GB | |
| Display Connectors | No outputs | No outputs |
| Check Price |
- GeForce GTS 360M is connected by MXM-II, and Radeon R8 M535DX uses IGP interface.
- GeForce GTS 360M is used in Laptops, and Radeon R8 M535DX - in Desktops.
- GeForce GTS 360M is build with GT2xx architecture, and Radeon R8 M535DX - with GCN 3.0.
- Core clock speed of GeForce GTS 360M is 656 MHz higher, than Radeon R8 M535DX.
- GeForce GTS 360M is manufactured by 40 nm process technology, and Radeon R8 M535DX - by 28 nm process technology.
Game benchmarks
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTS 360M and Radeon R8 M535DX have the same average FPS in Assassin's Creed Odyssey. | ||
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 50−55 | 50−55 |
| high / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTS 360M and Radeon R8 M535DX have the same average FPS in Call of Duty: Warzone. | ||
| low / 768p | 60−65 | 60−65 |
| medium / 768p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| ultra / 1080p | 7−8 | 7−8 |
| high / 768p | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| GeForce GTS 360M and Radeon R8 M535DX have the same average FPS in Counter-Strike: Global Offensive. | ||
| low / 768p | 70−75 | 70−75 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| GeForce GTS 360M and Radeon R8 M535DX have the same average FPS in Cyberpunk 2077. | ||
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 10−11 | 10−11 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTS 360M and Radeon R8 M535DX have the same average FPS in Dota 2. | ||
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 21−24 | 21−24 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| GeForce GTS 360M and Radeon R8 M535DX have the same average FPS in Fortnite. | ||
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 18−20 | 18−20 |
| high / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| QHD / 1440p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| medium / 720p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| GeForce GTS 360M and Radeon R8 M535DX have the same average FPS in Grand Theft Auto V. | ||
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 75−80 | 75−80 |
| high / 1080p | 27−30 | 27−30 |
| GeForce GTS 360M and Radeon R8 M535DX have the same average FPS in Minecraft. | ||
| low / 720p | 8−9 | 8−9 |
| GeForce GTS 360M and Radeon R8 M535DX have the same average FPS in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS. | ||
| low / 720p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| low / 768p | 45−50 | 45−50 |
| medium / 768p | 14−16 | 14−16 |
| ultra / 1080p | 0−1 | 0−1 |
| high / 768p | 12−14 | 12−14 |
| GeForce GTS 360M and Radeon R8 M535DX have the same average FPS in World of Tanks. | ||
Full Specs
| GeForce GTS 360M | Radeon R8 M535DX | |
| Architecture | GT2xx | GCN 3.0 |
| Code name | N11E-GS1 | Meso |
| Type | Laptop | Desktop |
| Release date | 7 January 2010 | 18 April 2017 |
| Pipelines | 96 | 320 |
| Core clock speed | 1436 MHz | 780 MHz |
| Boost Clock | 891 MHz | |
| Transistor count | 727 million | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 40 nm | 28 nm |
| Texture fill rate | 17.60 | 17.82 |
| Floating-point performance | 275.71 gflops | |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | |
| Memory bandwidth | 57.6 GB/s | |
| Shared memory | - | |
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_1) | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | 4.1 | 6.0 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.2.131 |
| CUDA | + | |
| CUDA cores | 96 | |
| Bus support | PCI-E 2.0 | |
| SLI options | + | |
| HDMI | + | |
| Maximum VGA resolution | 2048x1536 | |
| Laptop size | large | |
| Gigaflops | 413 | |
| MXM Type | MXM 3.0 Type-B | |
| Power management | 8.0 | |
| Check Price |